-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post. -
All this bollocks from Comolli! Arsenal may have been in the top 4 for bollocks amount of years, and we have not, but in that time we have won the bloody thing, unlike them!
Top 4 side my arse! We are a Champions league winning side you bitter underhand **** face!
Comment
-
Do you own a full kit?
Hello mert.Comment
-
No new Cross article yet? Been 24 hours since the last attempt.
Comment
-
Mail now running the story that Suarez considering legal action. Transfer request is a last resort apparently.
"Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob PaisleyComment
-
Lunacy isn't it?! Those journalists must be really thick. It would be so funny if this ended up in court. I can't imagine how a player would begin to suggest that they were being denied a transfer without first submitting a transfer request?
Comment
-
Did Cross not tweet about his good Arsenal supporting pal, Sami Mokbel, backing up his view of the Suarez situation last night in the Daily Mail? Almost word for word what Cross wrote the day before
Transfer request the last resort? And the headline refers to it as his "Dream Move". more like nobody else wants him
Last edited by Sarb; 06-08-13, 04:44 AM.Comment
-
Maybe the Suarez camp are leaking this stuff to Mr Cross. It's not something that should be ruled out in the absence of any other information. Whether you choose to believe or dismiss it is up to you. As always, I'm on the fence.Oh I don't know.Comment
-
No doubt that it's probably the Suarez camp and Arsenal leaking the stuff to the Arsenal journalists. The articles are pretty laughable really. Just look like to me they're trying to get Liverpool to blink first. If he wants to take legal action, he'd have been better advised to do it a couple of weeks ago, because it's unlikely he'll even get a hearing in time now before the window closes
And he would lose the legal case anywayComment
-
Well in that case you're somewhat contradicting yourself. You're slating the journalist and his output whilst saying that without doubt he is reporting the situation in good faith, as he is being fed specific information.
Whatever you think of Suarez and his agents and their behaviour, you're guilty of shooting the messenger.Oh I don't know.Comment
-
Journalists are supposed to do more than write up what they've been told verbatim I thought. Contextualising and critically assessing information?Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom-2 years1year0.5 yearsComment
-
A contradiction in part, yes. But I don't think they believe what they're writing is true though. It's their choice to write what Arsenal and Suarez's camp are saying. They could quite easily not write it, or write it in a non-biased view with an honest version of events.
There are many journalists rubbishing it and even stating that the case wouldn't be heard before the window. The timings of the articles (day of a home game) are obvious. All this stuff about a dream move... It's plainly obvious it's his only option
John Cross makes a habit of writing and saying stuff he knows is bullsh*t when it comes to Arsenal. He has no qualms about it either.
Not shooting the messenger. Just pointing out his ridiculous articles and commentsLast edited by Sarb; 06-08-13, 07:48 AM.Comment
-
Not to mention that I've heard John Cross is roundly mocked in the office on his Suarez articles over the last few weeks due to them being blatant b*llocks. Even Rory Smith had a bit of a tiff with him around itComment
Comment