Luis Suárez

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Assassin
    Kloppite
    • Sep 2006
    • 25908

    #24436
    Ere'

    The Uruguay and Liverpool striker has been banned from football for four months after biting Italy defender Giorgio Chiellini and the union have now backed the star

    FIFPro believe Fifa's decision to ban Luis Suarez for four months "infringes his right to work" and have vowed to support the striker.

    Suarez was hit with a four-month suspension from all football-related activities on Thursday and prohibited from playing for Uruguay for nine matches after biting Italy defender Giorgio Chiellini during Tuesday's World Cup Group D clash.

    The Uruguayan Football Association vowed to appeal against the decision, which has left them without their star man for the remainder of the tournament, and Chiellini stated that he felt the punishment was excessive.

    World players' union FIFPro have now come out in support of the under-fire frontman, who was previously in hot water for biting PSV Eindhoven midfielder Otman Bakkal in 2010 and Chelsea's Branislav Ivanovic last year, as Liverpool face up to the prospect of being without their prized asset for another lengthy period.

    A statement read: "FIFPro stands by the principle of fair play and the importance of upholding the duty of care each player owes his fellow professional.

    "FIFPro reminds all players it represents across the world of the responsibility they carry as role models, a privilege which is magnified at World Cup level.

    "With his case subject to appeal, Luis Suarez has the right to due process. FIFPro believes all affected parties may benefit with time to remove the emotion, reflect and re-establish the facts in a calm and considered setting.

    "This is a very serious matter, as reflected by the sanctions imposed by FIFA’s Disciplinary Committee. The sanction will be reviewed and FIFA will have to focus especially on the accumulation of sanctions including a four-month ban from all football activity.

    "The fact that Suarez is prohibited from working for a long period must be addressed as it directly infringes his right to work. Also the fact that Liverpool FC is affected needs to be an important issue.

    "Luis Suarez should receive all the support he needs to deal with any off-field issues he may be experiencing at this time. This means that the focus should be on the rehabilitation and serious treatment of the player. FIFPro believes that treatment must be a part of any sanction.

    "Luis Suarez deserves all the support he needs including legal support in the appeal case in order to achieve a reduction of the sanctions.

    "All affected parties will benefit from a well-advised decision especially when done in the interests of ensuring that he makes a successful return to the game."

    Comment

    • dom9
      Ant Pisser
      • Aug 2006
      • 69011

      #24437
      Well said them. Not like that self serving muppet, Gordon Taylor.
      Oh I don't know.

      Comment

      • G
        Paisley
        • Aug 2006
        • 16686

        #24438
        Is it not a bit silly to take past misdemeanours into account anyway. He's already been punished for them at the time, punishing him again is a bit mad. If you get 7 games for a bite in instance one it should be 7 games every other time you do it. Ramos has been sent off 18 times in his career,his bans aren't increased each time.

        Comment

        • tsb
          Dalglish
          • Aug 2006
          • 4808

          #24439
          Originally posted by G
          Is it not a bit silly to take past misdemeanours into account anyway. He's already been punished for them at the time, punishing him again is a bit mad. If you get 7 games for a bite in instance one it should be 7 games every other time you do it. Ramos has been sent off 18 times in his career,his bans aren't increased each time.
          Agree with this. He shouldnt be punished cumulatively for something he has paid his dues for. If he had a suspended setence then fine but this doesnt promote rehabilitation.

          The problem is that each incident was dealt with by three different jurisdictions and each have managed to put their own stamps on it.

          Comment

          • Assassin
            Kloppite
            • Sep 2006
            • 25908

            #24440
            Originally posted by G
            Is it not a bit silly to take past misdemeanours into account anyway. He's already been punished for them at the time, punishing him again is a bit mad. If you get 7 games for a bite in instance one it should be 7 games every other time you do it. Ramos has been sent off 18 times in his career,his bans aren't increased each time.
            Interesting point about Ramos, his is without doubt a serial offender

            Comment

            • Gibbo
              Like a boss
              • Jul 2010
              • 26212

              #24441
              Assassin my man
              The times they are a changin'.

              Comment

              • RichC
                Meh
                • Jul 2006
                • 37415

                #24442
                He's a serial biter, in isolation the punishment is way too harsh but what do you do when someone just doesn't learn? The punishment is made harsher, in this instance probably too harsh as it also has an effect on us but coupled with his lack of honesty/ remorse for what he's done its hard to have sympathy for him. IMO a suspended sentence would have been a good way to go, along with a international football ban and get him to find a solution to his issues.

                It's so frustrating as he's mesmerising to watch and one of the best footballers on the planet but from his actions we miss him for large chunks every season.

                Still don't want him gone but I can imagine if the right offer comes in FSG might decide to cash in

                Comment

                • captainfog
                  Lord Anthony Rivers
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 30746

                  #24443
                  Originally posted by rcasemore
                  He's a serial biter, in isolation the punishment is way too harsh but what do you do when someone just doesn't learn? The punishment is made harsher, in this instance probably too harsh as it also has an effect on us but coupled with his lack of honesty/ remorse for what he's done its hard to have sympathy for him. IMO a suspended sentence would have been a good way to go, along with a international football ban and get him to find a solution to his issues.

                  It's so frustrating as he's mesmerising to watch and one of the best footballers on the planet but from his actions we miss him for large chunks every season.

                  Still don't want him gone but I can imagine if the right offer comes in FSG might decide to cash in
                  With or without the biting if his release clause is met he goes, if it isn't he stays. Nothing has changed.

                  Whenever he's ****ed up before he's been honest and got hammered, so I'd imagine this time he's decided to go back to Uruguay and try and front it out.
                  https://www.needlesandgrooves.com/

                  https://twitter.com/NeedlesNGrooves

                  Comment

                  • G
                    Paisley
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 16686

                    #24444
                    Originally posted by rcasemore
                    He's a serial biter, in isolation the punishment is way too harsh but what do you do when someone just doesn't learn? The punishment is made harsher, in this instance probably too harsh as it also has an effect on us but coupled with his lack of honesty/ remorse for what he's done its hard to have sympathy for him. IMO a suspended sentence would have been a good way to go, along with a international football ban and get him to find a solution to his issues.

                    It's so frustrating as he's mesmerising to watch and one of the best footballers on the planet but from his actions we miss him for large chunks every season.

                    Still don't want him gone but I can imagine if the right offer comes in FSG might decide to cash in
                    Suspended sentence along with compulsory treatment on top of his 9 game ban would have been just. I reckon thats what we'll end up with after appeal. Won't be us benefitting though, I'm pretty sure of that too unfortunately.

                    Comment

                    • James P
                      This week, I have been mostly holding on too long
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 1693

                      #24445
                      Originally posted by shanks69
                      his statement is just so pathetic how do they even think something like that will help an appeal
                      His statement made me think of those stories you hear about people turning up at A&E with an "unusual" predicament, like having their knob stuck in the vacuum hose, and try to claim that they were hoovering in the nude and just slipped.

                      Comment

                      • RichC
                        Meh
                        • Jul 2006
                        • 37415

                        #24446
                        Originally posted by captainfog
                        With or without the biting if his release clause is met he goes, if it isn't he stays. Nothing has changed.

                        Whenever he's ****ed up before he's been honest and got hammered, so I'd imagine this time he's decided to go back to Uruguay and try and front it out.
                        He'll go if the deal suits us that doesn't always mean a "release clause" is reached.

                        Worked wonders for him, I tripped and fell into his shoulder, sort of thing a 3 year old toddler would use as an excuse for biting another kid.

                        Comment

                        • RichC
                          Meh
                          • Jul 2006
                          • 37415

                          #24447
                          Originally posted by James P
                          His statement made me think of those stories you hear about people turning up at A&E with an "unusual" predicament, like having their knob stuck in the vacuum hose, and try to claim that they were hoovering in the nude and just slipped.


                          Comment

                          • Kenneth
                            Pond Scum
                            • May 2007
                            • 65633

                            #24448
                            Originally posted by rcasemore
                            He's a serial biter, in isolation the punishment is way too harsh but what do you do when someone just doesn't learn? The punishment is made harsher, in this instance probably too harsh as it also has an effect on us but coupled with his lack of honesty/ remorse for what he's done its hard to have sympathy for him. IMO a suspended sentence would have been a good way to go, along with a international football ban and get him to find a solution to his issues.

                            It's so frustrating as he's mesmerising to watch and one of the best footballers on the planet but from his actions we miss him for large chunks every season.

                            Still don't want him gone but I can imagine if the right offer comes in FSG might decide to cash in
                            Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

                            Comment

                            • Boogs
                              Shankly
                              • Nov 2006
                              • 5921

                              #24449
                              Originally posted by G
                              Suspended sentence along with compulsory treatment on top of his 9 game ban would have been just. I reckon thats what we'll end up with after appeal. Won't be us benefitting though, I'm pretty sure of that too unfortunately.
                              It will benefit us because he will be able to play immediately at the start of a new season so any haggling over price because of the 4 month ban won't be an argument. Every cloud......
                              Go **** yourself

                              Comment

                              • ChesterDave
                                Paisley
                                • Oct 2010
                                • 32224

                                #24450
                                I think the point was that banned or not he won't be a Liverpool player next season
                                Football without Origi is nothing

                                Comment

                                Working...