Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Yeah but the FA don't care about how sh*t the football is. They just want to be there and to have a manager that knows how to flatter committee men and players and supporters that behave themselves...
Let's all go to England games and boo throughout.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
I went past Lancaster Gate last night and was tempted to take a **** through their letterbox but remembered they aren't at Lancaster gate any more.
I couldn't remember where they moved to.
Soho Square. Unless they've moved again.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Even if we could get 100,000 or whatever signatures, it's putting the issue into the hands of others. I don't think that's what we want, at least not at first.
I think we need to embarrass them somehow. Apart from themselves, what do they care about most? England?
Yeah but the FA don't care about how sh*t the football is. They just want to be there and to have a manager that knows how to flatter committee men and players and supporters that behave themselves...
Let's all go to England games and boo throughout.
We could start up a really **** brass band, only learning one tune (badly) and follow the team every where they go.
They're worried about their image so how do we f*ck it up for them?
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Makes sense. Too many suits in Adland, not enough blazers.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Even if we could get 100,000 or whatever signatures, it's putting the issue into the hands of others. I don't think that's what we want, at least not at first.
I think we need to embarrass them somehow. Apart from themselves, what do they care about most? England?
They have Roy Hodgson as their head coach for their national team
Might be difficult to embarass them
Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."
Comment