Suarez is on list
-
-
I hope Rodgers talks about this at his next press conference.
EDIT: Or not, if Suárez is on the shortlist.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
On the list if latest are to be believed. I'll leave this thread now after causing a panic
Comment
-
Sarb = Barbd.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Paul Kelso @pkelso 58s
PFA Player of the Year noms: Bale, Carrick, Suarez, Hazard, Mata, Van Persie. Young player: Hazard, Bale, Lukaku, Welbeck, Wilshere, BentekeComment
-
@pkelso
PFA Player of the Year noms: Bale, Carrick, Suarez, Hazard, Mata, Van Persie. Young player: Hazard, Bale, Lukaku, Welbeck, Wilshere, BentekeThanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
I said I wouldn't get mad at this, but **** it I am!
Edit: Hang on it seems he is nominated!
Comment
-
Welbeck
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
Welbeck Carrick deserved though
Comment
-
-
-
Hazard is a strange choice - he's looked decent but not outstanding.James Philip Milner Fanclub #1
Curtis Julian Jones Fanclub #1Comment
-
Harsh on MichuComment
-
Yep. Fitful brilliance. Michu should be ahead of him.Originally posted by Rich View PostThanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
We can always be annoyed about him being nominated as it stops us from being able to get worked up about him not being nominated. Frustrating.Originally posted by Pablo1981 View PostI said I wouldn't get mad at this, but **** it I am!
Edit: Hang on it seems he is nominated!
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
Comment