Originally posted by Exiled_red
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sunderland build up
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
But he doesn't actually win many balls in midfield and doesn't protect the back four well if you followed him closely. How can he protect the back four well if his positional sense is poor?! He runs around the pitch a lot and chases lost causes. As I said, nothing of real significance. His strength is actually his movement when we have the ball, always making himself available for a pass and does relatively well distributing, but defensively, his style of play only pretends to be effective, when it isn't.Originally posted by Muddled View PostHe's a nuisance, a whippet, a player that is constantly tapping at your heels. He's committed, enjoys a challenge and protects our back four well, whilst positionally he can be found out, I'd prefer some 'bite' in our team, than a midfield that is going to get bullied.
He's a complete liability with the ball, but I've said it thousands of times already. He's a non factor when we need a goal, slows down and hinders our passing game.I fail to see how playing last years player of the season is going to hinder us.Last edited by JohnDoe; 13-08-11, 10:10 AM.
Comment
-
I said he can get found out positionally, it doesn't mean his positional sense is poor. Arsenal took advantage of this last year at the Emirates when he got pulled out of his position when he didn't know whether to go to the ball or track the player and ended up in no mans land - that's only one example of the top of my head, it doesn't mean he's a headless chicken. I'm happy to give him the benefit of the doubt as he is developing as a player - I remember Gerrard being taught a lesson by Ginola, it's all about gaining experience. Whether he has a future here, I don't know, but for the now, he is a player that likes to stop the other team attacking. He's not as clueless as you make out.Originally posted by JohnDoe View PostBut he doesn't actually win many balls in midfield and doesn't protect the back four well if you followed him closely. How can he protect the back four well if his positional sense is poor?! He runs around the pitch a lot and chases lost causes. As I said, nothing of real significance. His strength is actually his movement when we have the ball, always making himself available for a pass and does relatively well distributing, but defensively, his style of play only pretends to be effective, when it isn't.
Lucas is not a complete liability, his main role is to win it back which he does with aplomb - I'm sure you'll have seen the statistics on this very site. His second role is to initiate an attack. Whether that is to play it square to Adam or across to Gerrard to take over that mantle, I don't care; his job is to stop the opposition. However, if you want to question his 'passing game', he has that in his locker if he was to be deployed further up the pitch. Just look at the ball he played for Gerrard in the 5-1 win at Newcastle a couple of years ago.Originally posted by JohnDoe View PostHe's a complete liability with the ball, but I've said it thousands of times already. He's a non factor when we need a goal, slows down and hinders our passing game.
As for turning to him when we need a goal, you're turning to the wrong player. What you do know is that our attack will be happy going for that goal, knowing that Lucas is mopping up behind him.
Comment
-
Craig, take notice. This is what a lot of the threads could do with this season.Originally posted by JohnDoe View PostMuddled, I could reply, but I don't want to drag this thread into another "Lucas: JohnDoe vs. the World". I respect your view.
John, I share some of your sentiments re Lucas. Still think he's an effective player at times though.Always borrow money from a pessimist. He won’t expect it back. Oscar Wilde
Comment
-
He shouldn't be, Agger, Carra and Skrtel are all better.Originally posted by Mostar View PostCahill, if we sign him, will be a starter.
Comment

Comment