Originally posted by Muddled
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Liverpool v Sunderland post match thread
Collapse
X
-
I wouldn't be surprised if Aquilani didn't have a driving license. There is no way he could pass the number plate test with his eyes.
-
I know what you mean but it would seem crazy to me for them to risk it.Originally posted by Mostar View PostMy point was that they may appeal with similar type of reasoning in mind with intentions of buying time not to reverse the previous decision but I guess there is always the possibility that 2-game ban could be increased as result of the appeal.
We'll have to wait until Monday to know for sure.
Having said that it does appear Wenger is cracking up so I guess anything could happen
Leave a comment:
-
My point was that they may appeal with similar type of reasoning in mind with intentions of buying time not to reverse the previous decision but I guess there is always the possibility that 2-game ban could be increased as result of the appeal.Originally posted by Exiled_red View PostYou can't look at things like that though, all they can do now IMO is decide that Barton should receive additional punishment if they feel the referee didn't see him pick Gervinho up (which I supect is what will probably happen)
We'll have to wait until Monday to know for sure.
Leave a comment:
-
You can't look at things like that though, all they can do now IMO is decide that Barton should receive additional punishment if they feel the referee didn't see him pick Gervinho up (which I supect is what will probably happen)Originally posted by Mostar View PostGood point they may want to review the entire incident from the start to the finish cause if Barton didn't "pick up" Gervinho the way he did nothing would've probably happened and the slap in the face I am not so sure he did that deliberately either.
Also I was under the impression (I could be wrong) that he doesn't need to start his suspension immediately
I think the ban is now immediate, a few years ago it too a week or so to come through, but they changed that a few years ago.
Leave a comment:
-
I think it's automatic and immediate unless the club appeal.Originally posted by Mostar View PostAlso I was under the impression (I could be wrong) that he doesn't need to start his suspension immediately
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Craig_H View PostI think that's definitely true, as the red card was a straightforward decision (like the one for Kieran Richardson SHOULD have been
), so i'm sure if Arsenal appealed, it would be considered a frivolous appeal and as such, result in probably a 4 game ban. That's the one thing which makes you think Wenger wont appeal it.
That's certainly trueOriginally posted by Neil Young View PostThe idea a couple of seasons ago was for bans to take effect immediately and any "frivolous" appeals, designed to delay the ban in the way Craig suggests, can be punished like you say.
Although the FA aren't known for consistency so anything might happen.
Leave a comment:
-
Good point they may want to review the entire incident from the start to the finish cause if Barton didn't "pick up" Gervinho the way he did nothing would've probably happened and the slap in the face I am not so sure he did that deliberately either.Originally posted by Exiled_red View PostI guess that could be a possibility, I thought appeals against red cards were dealt with very quickly though (although I could be wrong) and it's FA charges that take a while to be dealt with, hence Song might be available. I guess it's too early in the season to judge the way things will work this year...
In appealing don't they risk a longer ban? If so they would be stupid to appeal because IMO this is cut and dry, if the FA reduce the ban for this then they will open the floodgates for appeals.
Also I was under the impression (I could be wrong) that he doesn't need to start his suspension immediatelyLast edited by Mostar; 14-08-11, 01:29 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
The idea a couple of seasons ago was for bans to take effect immediately and any "frivolous" appeals, designed to delay the ban in the way Craig suggests, can be punished like you say.Originally posted by Exiled_red View PostI guess that could be a possibility, I thought appeals against red cards were dealt with very quickly though (although I could be wrong) and it's FA charges that take a while to be dealt with, hence Song might be available. I guess it's too early in the season to judge the way things will work this year...
In appealing don't they risk a longer ban? If so they would be stupid to appeal because IMO this is cut and dry, if the FA reduce the ban for this then they will open the floodgates for appeals.
Although the FA aren't known for consistency so anything might happen.
Leave a comment:
-
I think that's definitely true, as the red card was a straightforward decision (like the one for Kieran Richardson SHOULD have beenOriginally posted by Exiled_red View PostI guess that could be a possibility, I thought appeals against red cards were dealt with very quickly though (although I could be wrong) and it's FA charges that take a while to be dealt with, hence Song might be available. I guess it's too early in the season to judge the way things will work this year...
In appealing don't they risk a longer ban? If so they would be stupid to appeal because IMO this is cut and dry, if the FA reduce the ban for this then they will open the floodgates for appeals.
), so i'm sure if Arsenal appealed, it would be considered a frivolous appeal and as such, result in probably a 4 game ban. That's the one thing which makes you think Wenger wont appeal it.
Leave a comment:
-
I guess that could be a possibility, I thought appeals against red cards were dealt with very quickly though (although I could be wrong) and it's FA charges that take a while to be dealt with, hence Song might be available. I guess it's too early in the season to judge the way things will work this year...Originally posted by Mostar View PostI think what Craig is saying that if they appeal he may be still available for the game on Sunday and then serve his suspension the following week or after, not that they could win the appeal.
Basically buying the time approach.
In appealing don't they risk a longer ban? If so they would be stupid to appeal because IMO this is cut and dry, if the FA reduce the ban for this then they will open the floodgates for appeals.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah, that's how I saw it too. He raised his hands - red card by the letter of the law.Originally posted by Exiled_red View PostI wouldn't have thought so, on what basis could they appeal?
Despite Barton's theatrics it seems clear cut. He raised his hands and caught him in the face, it's violent conduct and should be an automatic 3 match ban.
For me the only question would be will they deal with the Song incident quickly enough for him to miss our game or not?
Thought it was pretty comical seeing 'hard man' Barton rolling around on the floor.
Leave a comment:
-
I think what Craig is saying that if they appeal he may be still available for the game on Sunday and then serve his suspension the following week or after, not that they could win the appeal.Originally posted by Exiled_red View PostI wouldn't have thought so, on what basis could they appeal?
Despite Barton's theatrics it seems clear cut. He raised his hands and caught him in the face, it's violent conduct and should be an automatic 3 match ban.
For me the only question would be will they deal with the Song incident quickly enough for him to miss our game or not?
Basically buying the time approach.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: