Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Liverpool v Sunderland post match thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mostar
    replied
    Originally posted by BootRoom View Post
    Replacing with Spearing wouldn't have been a totally outrageous decision in this instance, but not a long term plan. We've still got questions all over the pitch at this point.
    Who knows. Jay could've started and played worse and then everybody would be all over him for not starting Lucas.

    He thought Leiva was our best option today and unfortunately didn't work as well as he was hopping for.

    I also do think that we have other issues throughout the team and I wished those journalists at the post game conference asked him questions about playing Flanagan and not Kelly and for not featuring Aquilani at least on the bench.

    Leave a comment:


  • el matador
    replied
    theres really no point panicking because we still got a point and its only the first game of the season. weve a lot of new players and at times they were all over the place at times.

    adam, henderson, downing and enrique will all get a better understanding of how kenny wants the team to play over the next 5 to 10 games and ive no doubt we will do ok. i am disappointed but looking forward to the next game.

    Leave a comment:


  • Muddled
    replied
    Originally posted by Arn View Post
    Do Agger need to give the ball to Lucas or Adam as often as Carra do? The answer is no. If you need to do it all the time when you don't hoof it then it takes time and the chance to counter attack is over and you will be up an organized defence.

    The attacks start from the back. That is why you must have two central defenders that can make a quick pass without any problem and that can carry the ball without any problem.

    Fergie is starting to ease Ferdinand out with Smalling replacing him. AVB have a similar job to do easing Terry out.

    Carra, Ferdinand and Terry. Three central defenders that have been excellent but isn't that now.
    Having a centre back that doesn't *play the ball* doesn't hinder a counter attack, yes, hoofing might cost you possession, but a simple pass to our midfield won't slow us down.

    I think there is way too much emphasis on the need for ball playing defenders. I want my defenders to defend, I want them to stop the opposition in any way (legally) possible and put their body on the line. There is nothing wrong with having a blend of a technically gifted defender and a stopper (for want of a better word).

    Our attack starts when the ball is released from our defence, whether that is ten yards in our own half, or ten yards in the oppositions half.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rich
    replied
    Just watched the whole of the first half.

    Promising signs, think we just need a bit more fitness and for our new players to bed in.

    Leave a comment:


  • BootRoom
    replied
    Originally posted by Mostar View Post
    I can see where you're coming from but imo Lucas didn't have a particularly bad game but he didn't have a good game neither nor he played at the level we come to expect from him.

    I just think that Kenny rushed him and as much as that worked ok with Suarez it didn't work well in case of Leiva.

    When it comes to Adam and Lucas partnership they clearly need time to gel as they had no chance to play together in the pre-season and hopefully they both will forge the partnership and come through for us in the way that we all want to see.
    Replacing with Spearing wouldn't have been a totally outrageous decision in this instance, but not a long term plan. We've still got questions all over the pitch at this point.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mostar
    replied
    Kenny's post game interview



    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WEooDETxX4&feature=feedu"]Kenny Dalglish's Sunderland Verdict - YouTube[/ame]

    Leave a comment:


  • Arn
    replied
    Originally posted by Muddled View Post
    Arn, seriously.

    Carragher isn't weakening our right hand side attack - Carragher has no impact on how well we attack down the right. In the first half half, Henderson (and Downing) both dropped as Flanagan moved forward. Thus, Carragher isn't involved. It can be argued he is involved in the attack with his distribution, but he gives the ball to Lucas and Adam to let them build. If he's in a position were he can't play it out to midfield, he either goes across the defensive line, or yes, he hoofs it.

    Yes, I can see your point that defensively he is vulnerable and yes, we are looking to press the team at it's highest point - mainly working from the front, but our defensive line is still a straight bank of four that isn't *that* high up the pitch. When defending Carragher is influenced by Flanagan, but at what point defensively did Carragher and Flanagan cause any major issues for us today?
    Do Agger need to give the ball to Lucas or Adam as often as Carra do? The answer is no. If you need to do it all the time when you don't hoof it then it takes time and the chance to counter attack is over and you will be up an organized defence.

    The attacks start from the back. That is why you must have two central defenders that can make a quick pass without any problem and that can carry the ball without any problem.

    Fergie is starting to ease Ferdinand out with Smalling replacing him. AVB have a similar job to do easing Terry out.

    Carra, Ferdinand and Terry. Three central defenders that have been excellent but isn't that now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Muddled
    replied
    Originally posted by BootRoom View Post
    I was responding to the implication that Lucas was supposed to be providing cover to Flanagan, Carragher and Agger - i.e. whenever they became exposed it was Lucas' fault. I agree that in a defensive capacity, the primary role of the DM is to stop the opposition bearing down on the centre of our defence unimpeded. But if the DM gets dragged out wide, it is still expected that a different player would take up defensive duties in the vacated position.
    It seems that we have crossed wires then.

    Welcome to the site BTW, keep posting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mostar
    replied
    Originally posted by BootRoom View Post
    Yep I exaggerated your point to imply constant defensive interventions from Adam, but I still stand by the point that the lack of defensive help from his central midfield partner was a significant contributing factor to Lucas’ decline in the game.
    I can see where you're coming from but imo Lucas didn't have a particularly bad game but he didn't have a good game neither nor he played at the level we come to expect from him.

    I just think that Kenny rushed him and as much as that worked ok with Suarez it didn't work well in case of Leiva.

    When it comes to Adam and Lucas partnership they clearly need time to gel as they had no chance to play together in the pre-season and hopefully they both will forge the partnership and come through for us in the way that we all want to see.

    Leave a comment:


  • Muddled
    replied
    Originally posted by Arn View Post


    That was maybe even the most important signing this summer and we still haven't signed a new top class central defender.

    If Kenny want to play a high defensive line and press all over the pitch then he must replace Carra as soon as possible.

    Carra can still do a job but it should be as cover and not as a starter.

    If he want our right fullback to be able to attack a lot then he must replace Carra. It isn't only our defence that get weaker because of him. It also weakens our attacking options.

    If he want Lucas and Adam to play more box to box then he must replace Carra and get in someone that can cover for them when they attack.
    Arn, seriously.

    Carragher isn't weakening our right hand side attack - Carragher has no impact on how well we attack down the right. In the first half half, Henderson (and Downing) both dropped as Flanagan moved forward. Thus, Carragher isn't involved. It can be argued he is involved in the attack with his distribution, but he gives the ball to Lucas and Adam to let them build. If he's in a position were he can't play it out to midfield, he either goes across the defensive line, or yes, he hoofs it.

    Yes, I can see your point that defensively he is vulnerable and yes, we are looking to press the team at it's highest point - mainly working from the front, but our defensive line is still a straight bank of four that isn't *that* high up the pitch. When defending Carragher is influenced by Flanagan, but at what point defensively did Carragher and Flanagan cause any major issues for us today?

    Leave a comment:


  • BootRoom
    replied
    Originally posted by Muddled View Post
    Lucas - as a defensive midfielder - isn't expected to cover four positions, he patrols in front of the back four, providing cover and filling in for players as they venture out of position. It can be argued that the two wide players cover the full backs, so in essence, he's only covering the two centre backs. It has nothing to do with being Usain Bolt.

    Adam was at fault for the goal as much as Flanagan, but Adam ventured further forward when looking for a goal, however, in the first half, you can't really fault Adam's value to the team. In the second half, the team - as a collective - tired.
    I was responding to the implication that Lucas was supposed to be providing cover to Flanagan, Carragher and Agger - i.e. whenever they became exposed it was Lucas' fault. I agree that in a defensive capacity, the primary role of the DM is to stop the opposition bearing down on the centre of our defence unimpeded. But if the DM gets dragged out wide, it is still expected that a different player would take up defensive duties in the vacated position.

    Leave a comment:


  • Red_Polo
    replied
    Originally posted by Mostar View Post
    I find it interesting that you keep putting things in my mouth


    Disappointing start to the season, but I'll reserve judgement until I've seen the game in full. Keen to see how cohesive we look as a team at this early stage.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mostar
    replied
    If anybody needs links to download the match, in case if you missed it, just send me PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arn
    replied
    Originally posted by BootRoom View Post
    We're in real trouble if the CB situation isn't sorted out ASAP.


    That was maybe even the most important signing this summer and we still haven't signed a new top class central defender.

    If Kenny want to play a high defensive line and press all over the pitch then he must replace Carra as soon as possible.

    Carra can still do a job but it should be as cover and not as a starter.

    If he want our right fullback to be able to attack a lot then he must replace Carra. It isn't only our defence that get weaker because of him. It also weakens our attacking options.

    If he want Lucas and Adam to play more box to box then he must replace Carra and get in someone that can cover for them when they attack.

    Leave a comment:


  • BootRoom
    replied
    Originally posted by Mostar View Post
    I find it interesting that you keep putting things in my mouth and butchering my posts by taking things out of context.

    If you read more carefully some of my previous posts, you will find out that I expressed my concerns about Lucas and Adam partnership in the midfield as I think they (includes Adam just to confirm) looked very slow and sluggish and I'm not sure that set up with him and Lucas will work..
    Yep I exaggerated your point to imply constant defensive interventions from Adam, but I still stand by the point that the lack of defensive help from his central midfield partner was a significant contributing factor to Lucas’ decline in the game.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X