Bribe/influence referees.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
So what's the way to deal with a parked bus?
Collapse
X
-
ahh, the old fergie one two trick then hey. Sneaky, very sneaky sir. I like it, and will send an email immediatly to the King to let him know.Originally posted by JohnDoe View PostBribe/influence referees.
That's my new book. 'Shut the **** Up, by Dr. Denis Leary'. Patients come in. 'Doctor I-' Shut the **** up! NEXT!! 'Doctor, I've got this-' SHUT THE **** UP!! NEXT! 'He made me feel so much better. He just told me to shut the **** up. Nobody ever told me that before!'
Denis Leary - 1992
Formally known as Carras_boot on ****talk.
Comment
-
This I agree with. I think you can make space for players to exploit especially when a counter attack breaks down against a team determined to get 10 behind the ball in their third. You still need players to take people out of position and others to beat their man. Pulling play back as a training exercise lets others on your team work on ways to exploit any gaps in the defence.Originally posted by billy_mac View PostPatience is the key to all of this. Yes pace, passing and width are also important, but you pass it across the back and around midfield for ages until players get hungry for the ball and they come to close you down and then you attack.
Only the super disciplined defensive teams will stay in positions and not get drawn to the ball after a couple of minutes.
Only patient teams can matintain possession without hitting it long in hope after a while.
I don't think it's enough to rely on two or three key players to break a disciplined defence through skill alone.
When this tactic is done well, it's actually quite stunning to watch. It's not just that the Barca players are extremely good, it's what they do to the defence that's probably more impressive. A lot of this is worked on in training.
Of course it helps to have good players, but I think that's just half the story. 40% can be done with chalk on a black board.
Comment
-
Ball retention
Good movement off the ball
Switching the play (in 1 or 2 passes)
One touch football
All of these will stretch the opponents defence and create holes in which can be played through balls, crosses and scoring opportunities.
Simple really - just like how the game should be played!Nowt wrong with lurking!
Comment
-
Not conceding ****ty soft goals helps. At Anfield you almost expect it but not away..says a lot about us really. We have the confidence to keep the ball but haven't gelled enough as a team to relax and bide our time safe in the knowledge a goal is coming just yetSack swinging like Dub-D40 on a door hinge
Comment
-
would be nice if our players knew how to weld together several cars, trucks or vans and mount a homemade flame thrower on top and then drive it in from the midfield, scattering players before them, and saving the destitute townspeople of wherever they happen to be. i reckon we'd need a winger though.Last edited by little dave hedgehog; 16-09-11, 03:04 PM.dave of mutilation
Comment
-
Certainly sounds like more fun than a game of cricket.
We could call them The L Team.
With Kenny as Hannibal
Spearing as Face
Suarez as Mad Murdoch
and
Carra as BA Baracus.
I agree that we'll never reach #19 if we don't improve on our welding skills. I mean, look at what happened against Stoke. Still need a winger aswell.A humble guy with healthy desire.
Comment
-
The only problem is out-and-out welders are a dying breed.
These days they mostly cut in and that's the opposite of welding..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
a pair of out and out welders is of paramount importance.
Last edited by little dave hedgehog; 16-09-11, 06:02 PM.dave of mutilation
Comment
-
If we had two welders we'd be nailed on for the title..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment

Comment