Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

QPR build up

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 9
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 template Next
    #76
    My IAFN post was in relation to El Mata's posts lately.
    Are we winning?

    Comment

      #77
      Originally posted by Tee View Post
      Clint Dempsey = BR not backed.
      Budget constraints - transfer fee, salary, agent fee - could have been huge money for a short term signing. That's a business decision based on likely ROI and like it or not football clubs bar one or two are businesses

      Comment

        #78
        Originally posted by Nigey View Post
        My IAFN post was in relation to El Mata's posts lately.
        It's ok, I didn't take you seriously. No one does, Tarzy.
        .
        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



        May the Lord bless this post.

        Comment

          #79
          Originally posted by Tee View Post
          Clint Dempsey = BR not backed.
          There's a difference between backing the manager and giving him an open chequebook. Which would you rather?

          Anyways, are we dismissing that story about Dempsey preferring to stay in London because of his wife's job and his studies?
          .
          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



          May the Lord bless this post.

          Comment

            #80
            Would be tempted to restore brad jones in goal. We don't lose when he plays.
            Always borrow money from a pessimist. He won’t expect it back. Oscar Wilde

            Comment

              #81
              I'm reading this thread in the absence of having anything better to do. Has El Mat gassed himself yet? I'm starting to get concerned at his mental wellbeing.
              Oh I don't know.

              Comment

                #82
                Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                There's a difference between backing the manager and giving him an open chequebook. Which would you rather?

                Anyways, are we dismissing that story about Dempsey preferring to stay in London because of his wife's job and his studies?
                Open chequebook? That's ridiculous, and it is a well known fact that Dempsey was desperate to move to us. Not bothered we missed out but it set the tone for our season IMO.
                "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

                Comment

                  #83
                  How is it a well-known fact? Has he been caught on video saying it since his move to Spurs? Or perhaps it's just been widely reported but then so have lots of things that are complete b*ll*cks.

                  The point about the distinction I'm making is that the manager should have justify his spending decisions. The notion of 'back him or sack him' is simplistic, it's not how things work in reality.
                  .
                  Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                  May the Lord bless this post.

                  Comment

                    #84
                    Originally posted by dom9 View Post
                    I'm reading this thread in the absence of having anything better to do. Has El Mat gassed himself yet? I'm starting to get concerned at his mental wellbeing.
                    Have we lost yet?
                    .
                    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                    May the Lord bless this post.

                    Comment

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                      How is it a well-known fact? Has he been caught on video saying it since his move to Spurs? Or perhaps it's just been widely reported but then so have lots of things that are complete b*ll*cks.

                      The point about the distinction I'm making is that the manager should have justify his spending decisions. The notion of 'back him or sack him' is simplistic, it's not how things work in reality.
                      In this instance not backing him was significant and may have cost us this season. For whatever reason they failed to deliver for him.
                      "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

                      Comment

                        #86
                        Originally posted by Tee View Post
                        In this instance not backing him was significant and may have cost us this season. For whatever reason they failed to deliver for him.
                        Hyperbole. They gave him decent resources to work with.

                        Perhaps we pulled out of Dempsey due to the tapping up we were accused of, who knows

                        Comment

                          #87
                          I agree with Casemore. Tee, your take looks to me like a theory built on assumptions that may not have even the flimsiest foundations.
                          .
                          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                          May the Lord bless this post.

                          Comment

                            #88
                            Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                            I agree with Casemore. Tee, your take looks to me like a theory built on assumptions that may not have even the flimsiest foundations.
                            The irony of what u say.
                            "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

                            Comment

                              #89
                              Go on then, explain the irony to me.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment

                                #90
                                Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                                Go on then, explain the irony to me.
                                "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 template Next
                                Working...
                                X