Daniel Sturridge

[Doc_Piptorious]

Lacazette would be my choice for January. But he would not be cheap given how he has started this season. Then again none of the other names being banded about would come cheap.

If he was got, then he starts alongside one of Borini/Lambert/Balotelli when Sturridge is out, and alongside Sturridge when Daniel is fit.


He would bring pace, finishing, and a bit of that willingness to go at playrs and try the unexpected that we lost when Suarez left. Would be the type of attacker that would win a lot of frees and penaltys.


Bit of youtube malarky from the current season to give an idea what he is like.


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x38dYXQ8p-4"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x38dYXQ8p-4[/ame]

[Bender]

No I just get real ones now

[The Birdman]

I know Sturridge had a couple of injuries last season but isn't this the first time he's broken down consecutively with muscle injuries?

Sturridge started featuring regularly in 08/09 season, so if you include England games that's over 220 club and International appearances in 6 full seasons (including this one).

That's not a player who is injury prone.

[Daniel 7]

He's never been a regular starter until Liverpool though

[Carras_Shin_Pads]

Lacazette would be my choice for January. But he would not be cheap given how he has started this season. Then again none of the other names being banded about would come cheap.

If he was got, then he starts alongside one of Borini/Lambert/Balotelli when Sturridge is out, and alongside Sturridge when Daniel is fit.


He would bring pace, finishing, and a bit of that willingness to go at playrs and try the unexpected that we lost when Suarez left. Would be the type of attacker that would win a lot of frees and penaltys.


Bit of youtube malarky from the current season to give an idea what he is like.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x38dYXQ8p-4

Is this enough to give him his own thread on the transfer page?

[Slinky Skills]

it doss annoy me when he tweets stuff like that. If Jesus is responsible for getting him fit then presumably he was responsible for injuring him too.

[Daniel 7]

it doss annoy me when he tweets stuff like that. If Jesus is responsible for getting him fit then presumably he was responsible for injuring him too.

Nah, Jesus was saving him from the devil. The Devil is in his thigh and Jesus helped expel it. But now the Devil is back, so Jesus must have got complacent.

[The Birdman]

He's never been a regular starter until Liverpool though

And?
His last 2 injuries (after the first picked up with England) have come from zero, zilch, none, no minutes in games.
Training only.
The last 2 injuries have nothing to do with games played.


EDIT - Sturridge played 32 club games in 10/11 and 43 in 11/12. Over those 2 seasons he also played approx. 12 times for England full and 21's.
85-90 games in 2 consecutive seasons.

[Fan65]

What was it that Stevie G did to stop his recurring injuries when he was younger? Wasn't it something to do with his teeth?

I think you're confusing Gerrard with Suarez, he had problems with his teeth, they kept biting people.

Sad thing for him was that the club had to sell him because of it and look at him now.

[Shaggy]

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/daniel-sturridge-injury-latest-liverpool-striker-feared-to-be-out-until-the-new-year-9870530.html

Daniel Sturridge injury latest: Liverpool striker feared to be out until the New Year

Daniel Sturridge is feared to be out of the Liverpool side until the New Year, following his latest injury setback.

The 25-year-old suffered a thigh strain in training on Tuesday and though the club have not yet confirmed the seriousness of the condition, it is believed that he will not play any further part this calendar year in attempts to help Liverpool recover from a stuttering start to the season. His absence during the entirety of December would come as a heavy blow to manager Brendan Rodgers, whose side face a visit to Manchester United and Arsenal at home, seven days later.

The forward has been sidelined for ten weeks now and his season has lurched from one in jury setback to another. First he suffered a thigh problem while training for England at the start of September, leading Rodgers to express frustration over Roy Hodgson apparently disregarding the player’s request not to take part in training. That injury kept him out for nearly six weeks before the player injured his calf in the warm-up to his first session back, ending hopes that he would be fit for the visit to Queens Park Rangers.

Rodgers had harboured high hopes that Sturridge would be available to play for Liverpool at Crystal Palace on Sunday. The player’s suggestion earlier this month that he may be suffering from a genetic weakness has only heightened anxieties.

If Liverpool confirm the new, extended lay-off, they will be looking to Mario Balotelli to begin delivering, though he returns to Melwood after a difficult international break which saw Italy manager Antonio Conte insisting that will not be able to change Balotelli and casting doubts over his future in the national side.

Conte handed the Liverpool striker a first call up to the national team since succeeding Cesare Prandelli, but saw the striker sustain a hamstring injury that made him unavailable for the Euro 2016 qualifier against Croatia. “I’m not so arrogant as to claim that I'm different from the great coaches, but the past tells us that they failed to change Balotelli," Conte said. "It'll be up to the player, but I don't have much time and I need certain things."

Sturridge’s last start – in the 3-0 win at Tottenham on August 31- seems a distant memory in a season which Liverpool have scored a mere 14 goals and seem a shadow of last season’s attacking side. Rodgers wanted Sturridge fit for Liverpool’s match at PFC Ludogorets in Sofia next Wednesday. The side need a win to maintain any hope of qualifying for the knockout stages of the Champions League.

[Assassin]

Didn't Gerrard have back problems? I don't think it was teeth,

Shin splits when he was younger

[cream]

Lacazette would be my choice for January. But he would not be cheap given how he has started this season. Then again none of the other names being banded about would come cheap.

If he was got, then he starts alongside one of Borini/Lambert/Balotelli when Sturridge is out, and alongside Sturridge when Daniel is fit.


He would bring pace, finishing, and a bit of that willingness to go at playrs and try the unexpected that we lost when Suarez left. Would be the type of attacker that would win a lot of frees and penaltys.


Bit of youtube malarky from the current season to give an idea what he is like.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x38dYXQ8p-4

I wanted him in the summer and would love it if we could get him in Jan. Wouldn't be too expensive, wouldn't be cheap either

[alonso14]

it just gets worse.

[Lecter]

I wanted him in the summer and would love it if we could get him in Jan. Wouldn't be too expensive, wouldn't be cheap either

The big question appears to be can he play upfront on his own

If he cant we shouldnt touch him

[Lecter]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/liverpool/11240278/Liverpool-must-sign-striker-in-January-transfer-window.-Waiting-for-Daniel-Sturridge-futile-fitness-too-unreliable.html

Liverpool must sign striker in January transfer window. Waiting for Daniel Sturridge futile - fitness too unreliable
It wouldn't matter if Daniel Sturridge was greatest Liverpool striker since Ian Rush, he is - as Bill Shankly said about injured players - a 'bloody menace' when not available
Liverpool must sign striker in January transfer window. Waiting for Daniel Sturridge is futile - his fitness too unreliable
Waiting game: Daniel Sturridge has suffered yet another injury setback Photo: GETTY IMAGES

By Chris Bascombe


It is with great regret Liverpool must postpone their Premier League cavalry charge because Daniel Sturridge has handed in another doctor's note.

Sturridge is a fantastic footballer, but his latest injury underlines the risks of expecting his return to be the catalyst for a Liverpool revival.

For the last two weeks it has felt like Liverpool were preparing to re-arm with the help of a striker who can actually score goals but, not for the first time, just as they were readying to raise those swords and sprint into battle, they have been halted by the sound of a groan up ahead, their charismatic front man limping away holding his calf or thigh.

"Those darn genetics. They've struck again," is the not-so inspirational rally cry.

Brendan Rodgers has warned of Sturridge's absenteeism so much, this can't be dismissed as mere bad luck. Put aside the despair, it is hardly a surprise.

The concern is how much worse will it get without him? Mario Balotelli, Rickie Lambert and Fabio Borini have not scored a Premier League goal this season, and when you ally this to a defence which has added the derogatory adjective 'Lovren-esque' to the Anfield vernacular, you're left with a team deservedly in the bottom half of the table.

It has reached the point where Rodgers might as well presume Sturridge is not coming to the rescue any time soon and, by the time we do see him back in a Liverpool shirt, there may not be much left to play for unless there is a radical upturn in form.

It would not matter if Sturridge was the greatest Liverpool striker since Ian Rush, he is - as Bill Shankly once put it about injured players - a 'bloody menace' when not available.

If you can't trust your star striker to be fit there is no option but to look elsewhere. Liverpool must sign another striker in January. In fact, it's hard to recall the last time the club was so urgently in need of a new No 9.

Even during relatively barren spells they could rely on Robbie Fowler, Michael Owen, Fernando Torres and Luis Suarez to inspire victories.

Much maligned figures such as Djibril Cisse and Emile Heskey were world beaters in comparison to the current crop.

Go further down the food chain and those considered flops beyond Anfield were far more effective than credited. In 2000, Liverpool had successive games against Leeds United (home), Arsenal (away) and Manchester United (away) - the clubs finishing in the top three that season. The only front two available were Erik Meijer and Titi Camara. Liverpool beat Leeds and Arsenal and drew with United. Give Rodgers those two at Crystal Palace this weekend and you'll get work rate (Meijer) and a goal threat (Camara). Show Mario the videos and he will learn plenty, Brendan.

For all the (justified) focus on their defence and imbalance in midfield, Liverpool have never looked so bereft upfront, which is mindboggling considering they spent £120 million a few months ago, including £30m on three new strikers (one of which - Divock Origi - remains in France until July).

Now they've created a dilemma and a mess due to the failure to prepare and adapt to Luis Suarez's exit. There will be a premium to pay in January - especially as everyone can see how desperate they are - but Liverpool insist the money is there if it is required. If that is the case, it is inconceivable it won't be used, even if this will be interpreted as public acceptance serious errors were made in the summer. After the miserable defeat to Chelsea exposed the gulf in spending habits, Liverpool's transfer committee members ought to have used recent weeks practising the skill of pulling rabbits out of hats.

Rodgers's ambitions for the current campaign are in danger of being re-evaluated on a weekly basis, and yet the equally erratic form of their rivals still offers hope.

A year of consolidation in the top four, progression into the knockout stages of the Champions League and the collection of the first trophy of the Rodgers era was the ambition last August.

The Liverpool manager can argue all remain achievable despite a turgid campaign thus far, but it is the regression of Liverpool's playing style to that of 2009-12, as much as the results, that has caused a disturbance.

This latest season of transition was supposed to be one of a club within the top four preparing for a title bid next season, not of a side that nearly won it a year ago returning to the pack in readiness for its next Champions League qualification bid.

Liverpool have spent this year in Europe looking like they've returned to the elite competition too soon, while convincing no-one they are anywhere but Uefa's short-stay car park.

Sturridge's comeback was meant to change all this. He was to signal a return to the fluidity witnessed just once this season - when Liverpool hammered Spurs at White Hart Lane.

His latest scan will determine if he will be out for little while longer or until the New Year, but in the broader interests of the club it has now reached the point where - even when he is fit - Liverpool must consider his availability a bonus and prepare for the next setback. It was the player himself who said it could be in his DNA.

When Suarez was sold, Sturridge was in prime position to be Liverpool and England's leading man. Call it circumstances or pure misfortune, but it is not happening for him and clubs of ambition can not afford to wait. Liverpool must do what it takes in January to do what they failed to in August - identify and sign a striker who fits Rodgers style, with a proven track record for scoring goals at the highest level.

If they fail to do so, they might as well settle down and re-adjust to life in mid-table.