Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Play SG in the middle or sell him

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by red g
    Originally posted by Diego
    thats the bloddy point, he plays out right so he can cut into the middle with out having to battle out the midfield struggle. when he plays out right he doesn't play as a winger, but more as a right sided midfielder and thats very different, he gets freedome to roam around the midfield freely when he's out right...
    For whatever reason it is blatantly obviuos that he cannot play that role............. or doesnt want to.

    Perhaps last yr he thought he was helping the team....this season he realises that he is behind zenden in centralmidfield.

    If Rafa is pulling him to the side and explaining its zoz pennant is **** fair enough. But it looksincreasingly obvious that they have different ideas.....not good!!

    Ps perhaps houiller could come bak as assistant manager to put his armround him?
    Or maybe his bird could just stop ****ing around?
    Thomas Hicks Senior

    Comment


      Originally posted by Morphorino
      Or maybe his bird could just stop ****ing around?
      I have told her to stop ...but she just cant get enough of me
      _____________________________________

      Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

      Think we have the answer..Slot!!

      Comment


        Originally posted by red g
        I have told her to stop ...but she just cant get enough of me
        Pancake?
        Thomas Hicks Senior

        Comment


          Originally posted by Morphorino
          Pancake?
          _____________________________________

          Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

          Think we have the answer..Slot!!

          Comment


            Originally posted by Morphorino
            I'd give serious thought to a three man midfield of Sissoko Gerrard and Alonso.

            I'm adamant that this is what Rafa wants to play ala Valencia but he hasn't the players for it.


            ------Reina
            ---Carra--Agger
            -???---------Risse
            --Sissoko-Alonso
            -----Gerrard

            -------Kuyt

            The ???? could be filled by Alves and to me that side has the makings of a title challenger to me.

            But will we ever see it?
            What about

            ------Reina
            ---Carra--Agger
            -Neill ?--------Risse
            --Sissoko-Alonso
            Bellers-Gerrard-Gonzo

            -------Kuyt
            I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.

            Comment


              Originally posted by nebbers
              What about

              ------Reina
              ---Carra--Agger
              -Neill ?--------Risse
              --Sissoko-Alonso
              Bellers-Gerrard-Gonzo

              -------Kuyt
              i'd swap/rotate Bellers with Garcia

              Think that's also the only role for Stevie under Rafa that would suit both parties
              Its times like these we learn to live again FF

              Comment


                Originally posted by redlancer
                i'd swap/rotate Bellers with Garcia

                Think that's also the only role for Stevie under Rafa that would suit both parties
                Id swap Gonzo for Garcia untill Kewell is fit and then switch Garcia to the right.
                Thomas Hicks Senior

                Comment


                  I would have played Carra at RB, Agger & Sami at CB with JAR at LB.
                  In midfield I'd have picked Finnan, SG, Alonso & Zenden. Upfront, Crouch & Kuyt.

                  The reason for this is that Arsenals main threat is always Henry down the left. Playing SG at RM was always going to limit his freedom as we run the risk of leaving Finnan 1 on 1 with Henry. With Finnan at RM with Carra behind, it would have meant Henry had 2 good defenders on his side of the pitch. Also without Momo we needed SG's bite in the middle of the park. This side may or may not have won but it couldn't have done much worse than the 1 picked.
                  AKA Heighway No9

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by dww
                    I actually think that the problem comes from the lack of attacking contributions from other areas. I think ideally we need to have not only the front two and wide players chipping in but also the fullbacks giving options in attack. By playing two midfielders who shield the defence we should be able to release other players to attck at the minute though the fullbacks rarely overlap, the wide players cut inside ineffectively and seem reticent to cross.
                    Didn't I say something to that effect last week after the Reading game and you - or somebody else (forgive me) said I was wrong?
                    I also said we need midfield runners - get ahead of the ball - which will never happen in our current system
                    Liverpool born and bred.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Howard_lfc
                      Didn't I say something to that effect last week after the Reading game and you - or somebody else (forgive me) said I was wrong?
                      I also said we need midfield runners - get ahead of the ball - which will never happen in our current system
                      I'm not sure - depends which bit you are talking about. I think my view of liking two deep lying midfielders has been pretty constant. I have got more annoyed by the lack of overlaping fullbacks this week and become a Gerrard in the centre convert this week so I may have changed my views on some areas of our formation.
                      "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                      -- William Blake

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by dww
                        I'm not sure - depends which bit you are talking about. I think my view of liking two deep lying midfielders has been pretty constant. I have got more annoyed by the lack of overlaping fullbacks this week and become a Gerrard in the centre convert this week so I may have changed my views on some areas of our formation.
                        I think it was you dww. I didn't take offence as you obviously know your stuff mate. The wide areas of the team are SO important now - and having ****e players out there who can't do the job is killing us. That's the difference between us and utd - Giggs and Ronaldo v Pennant and Gonzales? No contest whatsover.
                        Liverpool born and bred.

                        Comment



                          I was mostly wanting to know what I had said so I could see if I had changed my mind, so I could find out why.

                          You are right the under-performance of the wide players is a problem. I thikn though that Pennant and Gonzalez should be given more time before they are written off completely, but they do need to sort it out and quickly. In terms of full backs - Finnan and Riise are decent and I suspect capable of doing a better job going forward than they have done away from home this season. But in the long run I have started tinking that we will probably need to see them both replaced with more athletic players.
                          "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                          -- William Blake

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Sir Bob
                            I would have played Carra at RB, Agger & Sami at CB with JAR at LB.
                            In midfield I'd have picked Finnan, SG, Alonso & Zenden. Upfront, Crouch & Kuyt.

                            The reason for this is that Arsenals main threat is always Henry down the left. Playing SG at RM was always going to limit his freedom as we run the risk of leaving Finnan 1 on 1 with Henry. With Finnan at RM with Carra behind, it would have meant Henry had 2 good defenders on his side of the pitch. Also without Momo we needed SG's bite in the middle of the park. This side may or may not have won but it couldn't have done much worse than the 1 picked.
                            We're of the same mind Sir Bob

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Red Chilli
                              Bottom line:

                              Sign Alves in january and play 3-5-2:

                              Reina
                              Carra, Hyypia, Agger
                              Alves, Alonso, Momo, Riise
                              Gerrard
                              Crouch, Kuyt

                              Have Riise and Alves bombing on.
                              Pity alves wont be joining us ever though.
                              Bill shankly to Tommy Smith after he'd turned up for training with a bandaged knee:
                              'Take that poof bandage off, and what do you mean YOUR knee, it's LIVERPOOL'S knee !'

                              "Sorry, boss, I should have kept my legs together," said Lawrence. "No, Tommy, your mother should have kept her legs together!," replied Shankly.

                              * After Tommy Lawrence had let in a fluke goal between his legs

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Sir Bob
                                I would have played Carra at RB, Agger & Sami at CB with JAR at LB.
                                In midfield I'd have picked Finnan, SG, Alonso & Zenden. Upfront, Crouch & Kuyt.

                                The reason for this is that Arsenals main threat is always Henry down the left. Playing SG at RM was always going to limit his freedom as we run the risk of leaving Finnan 1 on 1 with Henry. With Finnan at RM with Carra behind, it would have meant Henry had 2 good defenders on his side of the pitch. Also without Momo we needed SG's bite in the middle of the park. This side may or may not have won but it couldn't have done much worse than the 1 picked.
                                It is a pretty good plan, but I'm not convinced that as it happened Henry did all that much or that Gerrard limited himself in anyway, he just played poorly.
                                "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                                -- William Blake

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X