Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
It's a bit annoying sometimes when a discussion breaks out. Instead of a pre-match discussion, a match discussion and a post-match discussion just one match discussion thread would do? I don't have a problem with the moderation (usually) here, but there seems to be an insistence on peculiar conventions.
It's a bit annoying sometimes when a discussion breaks out. Instead of a pre-match discussion, a match discussion and a post-match discussion just one match discussion thread would do? I don't have a problem with the moderation (usually) here, but there seems to be an insistence on peculiar conventions.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment