Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FAO Stevie G & JAR

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    FAO Stevie G & JAR

    Communication

    Communication is the process of sharing information. In a simplistic form information is sent from a sender or encoder to a receiver or decoder. In a more complex form feedback links a sender to a receiver. This requires a symbolic activity, sometimes via a language. Communication is based on the idea of respect, promises, and the want for social improvement. Specialised fields focus on various aspects of communication, and include the following:
    • Non-verbal communication, the act of imparting or interchanging thoughts, opinions, or information without the using words;
    • Symbolic communication, the exchange of messages that change a priori expectation of events
    • Animal communication, the discipline of animal behavior that focuses on the reception and use of signals
    • Mass communication
    • Development communication
    • Communication studies
    • Interpersonal Communication
    • Organizational communication
    • Sociolinguistics
    • Conversation analysis
    • Cognitive linguistics
    • Linguistics
    • Pragmatics
    • Semiotics
    • Discourse analysis
    • Communication as a named and unified discipline has a history of contestation that goes back to the Socratic dialogues, in many ways making it the first and most contestatory of all early sciences and philosophies. Seeking to define "communication" as a static word or unified discipline may not be as important as understanding communication as a family of resemblances with a plurality of definitions as Ludwig Wittgenstein had put forth. Some definitions are broad, recognizing that animals can communicate with each other as well as human beings, and some are more narrow, only including human beings within the parameters of human symbolic interaction.


    Nonetheless, communication is usually described along three major dimensions:
    1. Content
    2. Form
    3. Destination


    With the presence of "communication noise" these three components of communication often become skewed and inaccurate. Between parties, communication content include acts that declare knowledge and experiences, give advice and commands, and ask questions. These acts may take many forms, including gestures (nonverbal communication, sign language and body language), writing, and speech. The form depends on the symbol systems used. Together, communication content and form make messages that are sent towards a destination. The target can be oneself, another person (in interpersonal communication), or another entity (such as a corporation or group).

    A particular instance of communication is called a speech act. A speech act typically follows a variation of logical means of delivery. The most common of these, and perhaps the best, is the dialogue. The dialogue is a form of communication where both the parties are involved in sending information. There are many other forms of communication but the reason the dialogue is good is because the dialogue lends itself to clearer communication due to feedback. (Feedback being encoded information, either verbal or nonverbal, sent back to the original sender (now the receiver) and then decoded.)

    There are many theories of communication, and a commonly held assumption is that communication must be directed towards another person or entity. This essentially ignores intrapersonal communication (note intra-, not inter-) via diaries or self-talk.

    There are many different areas of communication.A few are: nonverbal communication, verbal communication, and symbolic communication. Nonverbal communication deals with facial expressions and body motions. 93% of “emotional meaning” we take from other people is found in the person’s facial expressions and tone of voice, the other 7% is taken from what the person actually says (More Than Talk). Verbal communication is when we communicate our message verbally to whoever is receiving the message. Symbolic communications are the things that we have given meaning to and that represent a certain idea we have in place, for example, the American flag is a symbols that represent freedom.

    Interpersonal conversation can occur in dyads and groups of various sizes, and the size of the group impacts the nature of the talk. Small-group communication takes place in settings of between three and 12 individuals, and differs from large group interaction in companies or communities. This form of communication formed by a dyad and larger is sometimes referred to as the psychological model of communication where in a message is sent by a sender through channel to a receiver. At the largest level, mass communication describes messages sent to huge numbers of individuals through mass media, although there is debate if this is an interpersonal conversation.

    Communication is also the name for the academic discipline which studies communication.


    The next lesson will be on zonal marking
    In Rafa I Trust

    #2
    Quality post

    The zonal marking thing pisses me off though, that **** Andy Gray was whittering on about it yesterday again. And defending at corners... look at the stats from last season you prick! Fact is, if the players do their job properly and communicate effectively, we proved last season that the system works. This season the players just don't look to have that same level of discipline and communication and it all goes horribly wrong time and time again. We're conceeding due to individual errors, and that's a very worrying reflection on the relative psychology of the squad in general compared to last season
    I could not dig, I dared not rob:
    Therefore I lied to please the mob.
    Now all my lies are proved untrue
    And I must face the men I slew.
    What tale shall serve me here among
    Mine angry and defrauded young?

    Comment


      #3
      JAR - you can also have my phone number as well.
      I live with Steptoe.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Mumsafan
        JAR - you can also have my phone number as well.
        But he needs to learn how to communicate first
        In Rafa I Trust

        Comment


          #5
          JAR is king of communication. He just needs a cellphone on the pitch...


          We were somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the desert when the drugs began to take hold.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by CAD
            JAR is king of communication. He just needs a cellphone on the pitch...
            so does JP
            _____________________________________

            Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

            Think we have the answer..Slot!!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by MrMichael
              Quality post

              The zonal marking thing pisses me off though, that **** Andy Gray was whittering on about it yesterday again. And defending at corners... look at the stats from last season you prick! Fact is, if the players do their job properly and communicate effectively, we proved last season that the system works. This season the players just don't look to have that same level of discipline and communication and it all goes horribly wrong time and time again. We're conceeding due to individual errors, and that's a very worrying reflection on the relative psychology of the squad in general compared to last season
              Praps ive missed it but ive never seen that cnut Gray once mention when the zonal was working almost perfectly last season.

              Just another opportunity for him to jump on the bandwagon to have a dig and should be treated with the utter contempt it deserves.
              If you've lost your faith in love and music the end won't be long

              Comment


                #8
                I'm no expert on tactics but it seemed to me yesterday that first Gray was saying that in zonal marking systems, players don't mark opponents, they stay in their zones and attack the ball when it comes to theirs and then he was saying that Riise should have abandoned his zone and gone with Gallas.

                Is it really right that in a zonal scheme you leave your zone once the ball is in the air to go with an umarked player? Or is Andy Gray talking horse**** again?
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment


                  #9
                  I just thought that Gallas was in a zone which either Stevie or Riise should have been attacking. Not sure though as it is quite complicated to work out who is to blame without knowing exactly which areas players are asigned. I think Andy Gray has no idea how zonal marking works and neither do any of the British commentators as they have never played it and aren't coaches, so haven't seen it's machinations in that way either. I would really like to hear an analysis by a really informed commentator or better still from Rafa as to what has gone wrong on individual goals.
                  "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                  -- William Blake

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Neil Young
                    I'm no expert on tactics but it seemed to me yesterday that first Gray was saying that in zonal marking systems, players don't mark opponents, they stay in their zones and attack the ball when it comes to theirs and then he was saying that Riise should have abandoned his zone and gone with Gallas.

                    Is it really right that in a zonal scheme you leave your zone once the ball is in the air to go with an umarked player? Or is Andy Gray talking horse**** again?
                    Horse****, because the defending player shouldn't need to leave the zone, because the zone the attacking player is traveling to should already be covered.

                    I think the problem with zonal is that players like Zenden, Pennant and Gonzalez are **** at defending in this manner, so all the opposing player has to do is pick out their zones and attack them all the time. Can throw finnan and maybe Alonso into that as well, but they aren't as poor as the previous 3.
                    Thomas Hicks Senior

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Yup, I agree.

                      The "experts" on British television are a joke. Some of them are good for telling you what it's like to be a professional footballer, what the dressing room can be like, how it feels when you win or lose. On tactics, nearly all of them are shockingly inept, making inane comments based on little knowledge and even less research.

                      The only ones who I've ever found reliably illuminating are Pleat and, in the past, Venables, both of whom have/had a fair amount of tactical understanding by virtue of being managers/coaches. The rest of them can stick their digital chalkboards up their prozones.
                      .
                      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                      May the Lord bless this post.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Neil Young
                        Yup, I agree.

                        The "experts" on British television are a joke. Some of them are good for telling you what it's like to be a professional footballer, what the dressing room can be like, how it feels when you win or lose. On tactics, nearly all of them are shockingly inept, making inane comments based on little knowledge and even less research.

                        The only ones who I've ever found reliably illuminating are Pleat and, in the past, Venables, both of whom have/had a fair amount of tactical understanding by virtue of being managers/coaches. The rest of them can stick their digital chalkboards up their prozones.
                        Pleat's an anoying curb crawling **** tho, so that instantly counts him out. Was it Alan Smith who was commentating on the Spurs and Reading match before us, because I've never heard so much **** come out of a commentators mouth in all my life as I've heard from him. Oh and Chris Kamara talks ****e too.
                        Thomas Hicks Senior

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Morphorino
                          Pleat's an anoying curb crawling **** tho, so that instantly counts him out. Was it Alan Smith who was commentating on the Spurs and Reading match before us, because I've never heard so much **** come out of a commentators mouth in all my life as I've heard from him. Oh and Chris Kamara talks ****e too.
                          Ha ha, but it doesn't really count him out since it doesn't affect one way or the other anything he says about football.
                          .
                          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                          May the Lord bless this post.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I would add Jol, who valiantly tried to add tactical analysis to the BBC coverage of England games last year and up until the world cup but eventually seemed to get tired of getting stopped in the middle of a detailed point and began to conform to the moronic standards of everyone else.
                            "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                            -- William Blake

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Neil Young
                              Ha ha, but it doesn't really count him out since it doesn't affect one way or the other anything he says about football.
                              It affects my pleasure of viewing the game tho, and also possibly the cost of a new tv after I put my fist through it to stop the 'stupid man' speaking.
                              Thomas Hicks Senior

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X