Originally posted by dom9
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Liverpool vs Chelsea post match
Collapse
X
-
And was involved in the first equaliser, wasn't he?
I thought Rodgers had a good game. I think the starting line-up was totally understandable, it didn't work so he changed it as early as is sensible when you're only one down. The change worked, and based on how we played in the second half, we deserved the draw even if there were elements of fortune about the second equaliser..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
Depends what you mean by 'it didn't work'. We nullified Chelsea well from the off and their world class attackers really didn't get into the game. Then we went more attacking in the second half and scored twice, it was just the crap goals we conceded that spoilt a perfect 'Rafa' style master class.Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom-2 years1year0.5 years
Comment
-
Well, we did absolutely f*ck all and I can't believe that was part of the masterplan. If it had been then he wouldn't have changed things at half-time. So in that sense, while Chelsea weren't all over us, it didn't work. And I think they deserved to be ahead if only because they weren't great, they were nowhere near as bad as we were.
Good lord, your avatar is really unnecessary.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
Comment