Arsenal (a) match thread

[Kinell]

Kelly was well off the pace when he came on towards the end of the game against West Brom.

[Marina]

Whatever. Crazier things than beating Arsenal with two questionable wing backs have happened! Might as well hope for the best... haha

[Gibbo]

Surely going 4 at the back again would have been a better idea. Toure is more than capable. I'd even fancy Enrique to be better at RB than Flanno.

I'm really not sure. Hopefully he proves me wrong.

[danperkins]

Shocked at Flanagan starting

[RedReet]

Flanno is gonna surprise a lot of people.

Definitely our best backup for RWB and I for one am glad he's starting.

[Kinell]

Flanno is gonna surprise a lot of people.

Definitely our best backup for RWB and I for one am glad he's starting.

If there is one position we can afford to be weaker in its definitely one of the wing back roles.

[JohnDoe]

Playing three at the back when the two biggest weaknesses in the starting line up are your wing backs is a logic I can't follow.

[RedReet]

You tell them BR.

[Sarb]

****ing hell. Hope Flanagan isnt checking this thread on his phone

[BobTheCharmer]

I hope flanno has a blinder you miserable lot. Too bad I won't see it.

[DeanoUK]

I hope flanno has a blinder you miserable lot. Too bad I won't see it.

Me too, but it's a funny old line up and formation against a very attacking side. Lots of goals me thinks, hopefully with us winning.

[Marina]

I hope flanno has a blinder you miserable lot. Too bad I won't see it.

We are collectively quite miserable, aren't we?

[Daffy Duck]

Flannoooo

[RedReet]

Is this our first Saturday night match?

Don't like this studio ****.

[Gazzla]

Flanagan ****ing hell.... surely playing Kelly at right back or bringing in Agger and moving toure to the right would been preferable, even going 4 at the back or moving Henderson. In summary anything but Flanagan