Title Race 18/19

[Slinky Skills]

I think it's ok for people to deal with it as they see fit and let everyone get on with it. Personally I'm torn between rubbing everyone's ****ing nose in it to the absolute max, or just rising above it and all that. I dunno. I guess I'll see how I feel if / when it happens.

I've not bitten to any of it yet but ****ing right I will be rubbing everyone's nose in it if we win! We've had to put up with every cunt hating us since I've started watching football so they can all get ****ed now haha!

[RedReet]

I’m proper confused now

If we won 2, City drew 2 and United lost 2, it would be 8, 4 and 0 points, rather than 4, 2 and 0. The points are doubled, so in what world is it the same?

[dom9]

If we won 2, City drew 2 and United lost 2, it would be 8, 4 and 0 points, rather than 4, 2 and 0. The points are doubled, so in what world is it the same?

The proportions.

[RedReet]

Del.

[Mark79]

It couldn't be farther from that.

If we won 2, City drew 2 and United lost 2, it would be 8, 4 and 0 points, rather than 4, 2 and 0. The points are doubled, so in what world is it the same?

Are you joking?

Because it’s exactly the same margins. The value of a win respective to a draw is the same. Either way it takes City one win or 2 draws to reach Liverpool’s total. Or Utd would need 2 wins or 4 draws.

So it’s the same thing with bigger numbers.

The whole point of going 3 points for win was to make them more valuable in relation to a draw. At the minute a win is 3 times as valuable as a draw. Whether it’s 4/2points or 2/1 points then a win is only twice as valuable.

[topscorer]

Lol

Resident mathematicians dispute.

[Mark79]

Lol

Resident mathematicians dispute.

I’m no mathematician. And on this evidence, I’m pretty sure RedReet isn’t either. Although he’s dead right about 4 being twice as much as 2, can’t argue with that

[Norbs]

94pts. Currently the 3rd highest points tally in PL history

We are brilliant

[topscorer]

I’m no mathematician. And on this evidence, I’m pretty sure RedReet isn’t either. Although he’s dead right about 4 being twice as much as 2, can’t argue with that

I hope he doesn't gamble.

He'll be taking the 4/2 over 2/1 everytime.

[RedReet]

I’m no mathematician. And on this evidence, I’m pretty sure RedReet isn’t either. Although he’s dead right about 4 being twice as much as 2, can’t argue with that

Did this conversation not start because Spurs are 3rd, despite losing 13 games?

[Phoenix07]

Wolves wont be an easy walk over...

Reckon they will be more of a struggle than Newcastle were

It wouldn't surprise me if City won the league drawing against Leicester and beating Brighton, because we draw with Wolves.

[rodo]

It wouldn't surprise me if City won the league drawing against Leicester and beating Brighton, because we draw with Wolves.

that`s the spirit

[Fuzzy]

[Mark79]

Did this conversation not start because Spurs are 3rd, despite losing 13 games?

Don't know. I was just replying to Tee that going 4 points and 2 points for a win and a draw is effectively just going back to the old 2 points/1 point system.

[RedReet]

Don't know. I was just replying to Tee that going 4 points and 2 points for a win and a draw is effectively just going back to the old 2 points/1 point system.

I was wrong actually, that was just the order I read the threads in. Either way, although your sums are right for wins and draws, you are still discounting loses and the difference that makes, are you not? I'm happy to be proven wrong as I'll admit I'm a wee bit tipsy and everyone is having a chuckle at my bad maths, but using Tee's scoring system, would the title not be on our own using his points?