Fulham away thread

[Angryred]

With Trent not covering his man has cost us a few games recently, more so the UCL final when he didn't track ya man's run to the goal!

[Mark79]

It should have asked him to have another look at least. There was enough doubt to ask him to do that, probably not enough to overturn it based on the mixed opinions in here at least.

The VAR got it right in terms of procedure. There was contact, however slight (it was still a dive). The VAR is only supposed to ask the ref to review it if the replay was inconclusive.

[Doc_Piptorious]

With Trent not covering his man has cost us a few games recently, more so the UCL final when he didn't track ya man's run to the goal!

Even more reason not to play him in midfield as he would have far more runners to track in the middle.

[SB]

The VAR got it right in terms of procedure. There was contact, however slight (it was still a dive). The VAR is only supposed to ask the ref to review it if the replay was inconclusive.

There was definitely a leg in front of him but without ‘ snicko ‘ technology I’m not 100% convinced there was contact 😉