Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Worrying Article about DIC's intentions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Worrying Article about DIC's intentions

    Not sure how true this is, but it's certainly different to what we're expecting from the DIC takeover.

    Buyers plan to sell Liverpool in seven years

    By Mihir Bose
    Last Updated: 11:44pm GMT 26/12/2006

    In pics: Premiership action
    Your View: Football fans' forum

    Liverpool, who are being bought by an investment company effectively owned by the Dubai government, could be sold again in seven years' time, according to a confidential document seen by The Daily Telegraph.

    The document also reveals that Dubai International Capital are planning to borrow up to £300 million to finance their £450m purchase of the club.

    DIC see their investment in Liverpool as purely a business deal built round the new stadium Liverpool are planning at Stanley Park. When they sell in seven years' time they are hoping to make a huge profit, providing a return of around 25 per cent on their investment for every year of ownership. There appear to be no plans to invest in new players.

    Furthermore, DIC will not be the sole owners of Liverpool, unlike Roman Abramovich at Chelsea, the Glazers at Manchester United and Randy Lerner at Aston Villa. Although their deal to buy Liverpool is not yet signed and sealed, they are already looking for other investors to join them in a partnership. I understand that 30 per cent of the 90 per cent stake DIC are bidding for is being offered to City investors.
    advertisement

    The seven-page document, which outlines the investment rationale, has been circulated to major City investors to attract them to join the consortium.

    DIC have said little about why they want to buy Liverpool, but with the company ultimately owned by the fabulously wealthy Al Maktoum family, who are the ruling family of Dubai, the purchase has been seen as Liverpool's equivalent of Abramovich arriving at Chelsea, the investor with deep pockets that all football clubs crave.

    Indeed, that is the reason David Moores, the chairman of Liverpool, gave for choosing DIC over George Gillett, the American who owns the Montreal Canadiens ice hockey team and is very keen to buy Liverpool.

    However, anyone reading the document can have no doubt that this is purely an investment decision. And with DIC seeking partners, there is also no knowing who else will be in the Liverpool boardroom.

    The great investment opportunities that Liverpool provide, as DIC see it, are set out in a section entitled "The Opportunity". The document says: "Opportunities exist to boost returns by unlocking 'hidden' value. We believe there is potential for multiple arbitrage if real estate/leisure is developed on the current Anfield site. Such an investment would allow the Middle East region to leverage on a strong brand with an equally strong international fan base."

    The document tells potential investors that over the next five years a return starting at 19.3 per cent could rise to 29 per cent in year five.

    One of the most revealing insights is when the document talks of how the financing will be done. A whole page is devoted to it and shows that three banks – Bank of Ireland, RBS and Bank of America – have been approached, with Bank of America the favourite.

    It is clear that the new stadium is at the heart of this deal. The budget for the stadium is £240m; Liverpool want a fixed-price contract like Wembley and want penalties of £950,000 per week if the contractor is late.

    The DIC document notes that the stadium, which will seat 61,000, will cost less per seat than Arsenal's Emirates Stadium. The document also provides a wonderful insight into DIC's thinking but is very different from the fans' expectations about this purchase – and would have been very different from the purchase of the club by Gillett.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/mai...7/sfnliv27.xml
    White liquid in a bottle = Milk

    Purslow = C*nt

    #2
    Mihir Bose knows his stuff, however I`d be really surprised if Moores and Parry what is going on with the takeover

    Obviously, once DIC owns the club they could do what was stated in the article, and sell some of their share on and I guess its DIC who is buying the club, not the Dubai Royal Famile

    Slightly worried, but still willingly to be positive
    We need better attacking players!

    Torres aint enough

    Rafas number #1 fan

    Comment


      #3
      Yeah, I would be extremely surprised that Moores and Parry would be willing to sell to DIC if these are DIC's intentions
      White liquid in a bottle = Milk

      Purslow = C*nt

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Dhavlos View Post
        Yeah, I would be extremely surprised that Moores and Parry would be willing to sell to DIC if these are DIC's intentions
        Depends on whether Moores & Parry KNOW about these intentions, assuming they were accurate.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by DJS View Post
          Depends on whether Moores & Parry KNOW about these intentions, assuming they were accurate.
          Indeed, but how can this journalist be aware of their intentions and Moores and Parry not know?
          White liquid in a bottle = Milk

          Purslow = C*nt

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Dhavlos View Post
            Indeed, but how can this journalist be aware of their intentions and Moores and Parry not know?

            It's obviously unlikely, but if there HAS been a report leaked...that would answer it.

            Comment


              #7
              I am worried ... anyone got Gillett's number ?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by DJS View Post
                It's obviously unlikely, but if there HAS been a report leaked...that would answer it.
                In this scenario surely they've been lying to Moores and Parry about their plans for the future, because I'm sure there's no way Moores would sell to them if their only motivation is to make a capital gain
                White liquid in a bottle = Milk

                Purslow = C*nt

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Dhavlos View Post
                  In this scenario surely they've been lying to Moores and Parry about their plans for the future, because I'm sure there's no way Moores would sell to them if their only motivation is to make a capital gain
                  Well if those are their intentions, then obviously they'd lie, in order to get their bid accepted.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I'm not too sure about the details, but it's certainly a possibility that they'll sell us once they've turned us into a better business. That is after all what investment companies do.

                    I wouldn't get too hung up on the £300m debt figure because it doesn't really add up.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by DJS View Post
                      Well if those are their intentions, then obviously they'd lie, in order to get their bid accepted.
                      In which case this should be the death of their bid then, if true of course
                      White liquid in a bottle = Milk

                      Purslow = C*nt

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Dhavlos View Post
                        In which case this should be the death of their bid then, if true of course
                        So how do we get our new stadium then ?

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Rosco View Post
                          So how do we get our new stadium then ?
                          I think you will find if the story has any substance the club will be asking it's legal dept to request a copy of this document to see it's full content, which the reporter fails to mention after sowing the seeds... But the way I see it is that our new stadium plans are a city project and as such DIC have every right to seek other local and city investors to put money in and spread the cost. After all investment companies never use soley their own money, as in this case 30% of DIC shares will be sold as short term dividends to attract investors.

                          I personally feel that there is something not quiet right about this document; though I agree it is a worry of course and not something we fans want to hear, but if anything untoward was going on Moores and Parry will now be fully aware of this artical and looking into the matter.

                          Finally Gillette is still in the race, as the club have not accepted any bid as yet....So if the DIC bid goes pear shape because of this there are people waiting in the shadows...

                          Comment


                            #14
                            That would be bad marketing by DIC so I doubt that this will happen.

                            They want to be seen as one of the best if not the best investment company in the world and by doing what this article say that they will do would put their name in shame and they would never allow that to happen.
                            Just believe and you never know what will happen.

                            According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by AFII View Post
                              That would be bad marketing by DIC so I doubt that this will happen.

                              They want to be seen as one of the best if not the best investment company in the world and by doing what this article say that they will do would put their name in shame and they would never allow that to happen.
                              Why would this put their "name in shame" ?

                              If you were looking to make money out of a business and thought you could do it with other peoples money and not risking any of your own cash wouldn't you try it ?
                              Last edited by Rosco; 27-12-06, 10:02 AM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X