Brendan Rodgers

[~LFCHistory~]

Well in that case it was an odd point to make, as clearly he hasn't drifted away from talking about leadership

Please read this carefully :

Originally Posted by ~LFCHistory~
You seem to have drifted away from the original point which was you stated that Brendan doesn't care about having leadership in his team unlike Rafa which I pointed out was utter nonsense. Brendan's preference for Carragher over Skrtel and the signing of Toure I think are evidence that he does recognise the importance of leadership in the squad.


The issue isn't so much about leadership as it is about Arn's belief that Brendan doesn't value leadership which is quite provably wrong.

[G]

Fair enough but Craig was banned for less. Maybe if he had adopted a more idiosyncratic style of writing instead of a smiley fetish he'd still be around eh?

I didn't have a problem with Craig either but he's gone and I don't care. I like Arn, he's bat**** mental yeah and a bit of a broken record but he's a good egg. I tend to gloss over his posts when he repeats himself, others would do well to do similar.

[Red_Polo]

Please read this carefully :

Originally Posted by ~LFCHistory~
You seem to have drifted away from the original point which was you stated that Brendan doesn't care about having leadership in his team unlike Rafa which I pointed out was utter nonsense. Brendan's preference for Carragher over Skrtel and the signing of Toure I think are evidence that he does recognise the importance of leadership in the squad.


The issue isn't so much about leadership as it is about Arn's belief that Brendan doesn't value leadership which is quite provably wrong.

Thanks for the revised post, which I have now read carefully. I don't necessarily agree with Arn, so there's really no point debating it with me.

Just pointing out that your arguments don't actually match what Arn says. Perhaps you need to read more carefully?

[dom9]

Some of the abuse Arn gets is well out of order.
Disagreeing is one thing but namecalling is another.

I've not seen name calling, but I disagree. It's not malicious, and he brings it all onto himself.

For the record, Arn, I like you. But personal insults should not happen.

[~LFCHistory~]

Thanks for the revised post, which I have now read carefully. I don't necessarily agree with Arn, so there's really no point debating it with me.

Just pointing out that your arguments don't actually match what Arn says. Perhaps you need to read more carefully?

I think my argument matched exactly what Arn said, here's the line I originally responded to :

''Leadership was also very important if you would fit in back in the Rafa days. Rodgers don't seem to think that is so important''

http://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showpost.php?p=2685919&postcount=7126

[fidget]

I've not seen name calling, but I disagree. It's not malicious, and he brings it all onto himself.

For the record, Arn, I like you. But personal insults should not happen.

No probs Dom you ****wit

[dom9]

Cunt flap.

[Chazza]

Flap

[little dave hedgehog]

arn you tedious ****wit isn't name calling?

i think it was used fairly seriously as well

[Fosterbloke]

Arn has 'man resilience' .

[Fivex]

Double man strength :respects:

[DannyMan2006]

Another thread being ruined for one reason of another I see......

[Muddled]

One man's ruined is another man's eye comedy.

It's close season after all?

[Kenneth]

If you tolerate Arn then your children will be next.

Doesn't really make sense, but

[Neil Young]

So Rodgers, yeah?