Why does it have to be the striker (or Firmino) that makes the difference? Like any good poacher Salah followed in Firmino's lob against Watford and finished it off. That should have been the winner. Mane, taking up a forward's position finished off a move against Palace, securing the 3 points. I'm sure there are other examples.
Despite our relatively poor start, we're still 3rd highest scorers in the league, despite this so called striking handicap.
I can see a case for this argument if the goals for Mane and Salah dry up. In that scenario, we need a CF to step up and make the difference and if Firmino falters, then maybe we need to look at other options. For now though, I don't see it as being a big issue, especially considering our two best players have missed a combined 6.5 games and we've yet to field our strongest attack in teh league.
Despite our relatively poor start, we're still 3rd highest scorers in the league, despite this so called striking handicap.
I can see a case for this argument if the goals for Mane and Salah dry up. In that scenario, we need a CF to step up and make the difference and if Firmino falters, then maybe we need to look at other options. For now though, I don't see it as being a big issue, especially considering our two best players have missed a combined 6.5 games and we've yet to field our strongest attack in teh league.
I mentioned similar over the summer. All our rivals have a striker that's good for 20/25 possibly even 30 goals over the season, Firmino brings a lot to our team but so far, he hasn't displayed enough ability in front of goal.
Comment