Jürgen Klopp

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • G
    Paisley
    • Aug 2006
    • 16686

    #2641
    He's transformed Lovren and Kolo into dependable CB's, probably reckoned he could do the trick again on Marty.You're just a bloke Jurgen, not a miracle worker. Nobody is that good.

    Terrible sub.

    Comment

    • Fredo
      Not to be taken seriously
      • Aug 2010
      • 35173

      #2642
      We were struggling for control all game in midfield. We were excellent on the counter in the first half and exploited spaces between Southampton's midfield and defence. But we were never comfortable. Klopp should have addressed by sacrificing an attacker for another midfielder at half time. Sometimes he needs to be a bit more pragmatic.
      Are we winning?

      Comment

      • danperkins
        Martin Skrtel can win a game of Connect Four in three moves
        • May 2010
        • 50408

        #2643
        He had a ****ing mare alright.

        Comment

        • Phoenix07
          The Normal One
          • Sep 2008
          • 10405

          #2644
          Klopp a bit pissed at Benteke?

          Comment

          • redmike65
            Shankly
            • Apr 2015
            • 7114

            #2645
            Beyond the fact that Lovren as on a yellow I see no reason to change, and Kolo was also on the bench, and finally Skrtel was gash against an u21 side. Klopp must have got a report on that.

            Perplexing.

            Comment

            • danperkins
              Martin Skrtel can win a game of Connect Four in three moves
              • May 2010
              • 50408

              #2646
              Originally posted by Phoenix07
              Klopp a bit pissed at Benteke?

              https://streamable.com/b3ax
              Good he missed two sitters, game should have been done.

              Comment

              • Exiled_red
                Paisley
                • Nov 2007
                • 55256

                #2647
                Originally posted by redmike65
                Beyond the fact that Lovren as on a yellow I see no reason to change, and Kolo was also on the bench, and finally Skrtel was gash against an u21 side. Klopp must have got a report on that.

                Perplexing.
                In fairness Lovren seemed to be having a difficult time of it in the first half and was on a booking, he had had a few shakey moment - the booking and the penalty incident, to name a couple. I think it was reasonable to consider making a change, especially with the side 2-0 up it's understandable that you don't want to make a mistake and see Lovren sent off and let them back in the game.

                Skrtel is an experienced defender so you don't expect to send him on and him gift the win to the opposition, it's not the change I would have made (I would have gone with Kolo) but on paper it isn't a terrible change to make
                The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

                Comment

                • danperkins
                  Martin Skrtel can win a game of Connect Four in three moves
                  • May 2010
                  • 50408

                  #2648
                  Lovren was having a poor game so I get the decision to get him off. Skrtel has been out for months, Toure should have been the choice Imo. Also no way Benteke should have been on, the midfield were struggling to cope with Wanyama and Mane... Henderson should have a banker to come on to shore things up.

                  Two very poor choices for me, whereas Koeman made two excellent choices.

                  Comment

                  • danperkins
                    Martin Skrtel can win a game of Connect Four in three moves
                    • May 2010
                    • 50408

                    #2649
                    Dup

                    Comment

                    • Muddled
                      Meat Shield
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 25665

                      #2650
                      I can see the thought process behind Klopp's decision. Going by our first half performance, Klopp has seen the opportunity to give Skrtel some game time and remove the risk of being reduced to ten men by having him replace Lovren. We were coasting and looked to be in a position to build on that.

                      What Klopp won't have expected is Skrtel to turn in that absolute cluster**** of a performance. And why should he? Regardless of his perceived ability, he's a seasoned international with a number of years experience!

                      Klopp made the call and yeah, he has to shoulder some blame, but that's Skrtel. And seeing people refusing to accept his limited ability and focus all the blame on to Klopp is making my toes curl.

                      Comment

                      • Muddled
                        Meat Shield
                        • Jul 2010
                        • 25665

                        #2651
                        Duplicate.

                        Comment

                        • Fredo
                          Not to be taken seriously
                          • Aug 2010
                          • 35173

                          #2652
                          I don't think Lovren was too bad. Flannagan didn't have the best of games and that didn't help. Swapping Skrtel for Lovren exacerbated the problem. Skrtel takes the flack but Klopp should equally be taking it for making the wrong decisions, especially if it turns out his hand wasn't forced due to injury.

                          Flannagan didn't have the best of games and left his centre back exposed, so at least if there was a tactical decision to make, it should have been to deal with that situation.
                          Are we winning?

                          Comment

                          • Buzzo
                            Donald Buzzworth
                            • Jun 2010
                            • 67435

                            #2653
                            Klopp gets more decisions right than he does wrong. What he is learning though are the guys he can turn to, the guys he can trust when he brings them on.

                            He definitely knows Big Chris will not do what he wants given the bollockings he always gets, and he is now learning that Marty causes chaos whenever he is on the pitch. Once Klopp has some of his own signings he will be able to assess situations and decide which players he can utilise.

                            Its a big defeat today, and I'd imagine another nail in Big Chris's coffin and Skrtels too. Being brought on at 2 up, giving a way a pen and 3 goals in 45 mins is horrific.
                            Modifying post.

                            Comment

                            • Red_Polo
                              Takin' Her Easy
                              • Jul 2006
                              • 35520

                              #2654
                              Originally posted by Muddled
                              I can see the thought process behind Klopp's decision. Going by our first half performance, Klopp has seen the opportunity to give Skrtel some game time and remove the risk of being reduced to ten men by having him replace Lovren. We were coasting and looked to be in a position to build on that.

                              What Klopp won't have expected is Skrtel to turn in that absolute cluster**** of a performance. And why should he? Regardless of his perceived ability, he's a seasoned international with a number of years experience!

                              Klopp made the call and yeah, he has to shoulder some blame, but that's Skrtel. And seeing people refusing to accept his limited ability and focus all the blame on to Klopp is making my toes curl.
                              Agree with that. Hindsight makes the Skrtel sub appalling, but it's the player himself who must take much of the blame for his performance.

                              The fact Benteke didn't work either makes it look even worse but with Firmino and Ings out we were short of a better option.

                              Ultimately for some time now three of our weakest links have been Mignolet, Skrtel, Benteke and stuff like this is inevitable until they are usurped by genuinely superior players.
                              Like blood on iron

                              Comment

                              • Exiled_red
                                Paisley
                                • Nov 2007
                                • 55256

                                #2655
                                Originally posted by Muddled
                                I can see the thought process behind Klopp's decision. Going by our first half performance, Klopp has seen the opportunity to give Skrtel some game time and remove the risk of being reduced to ten men by having him replace Lovren. We were coasting and looked to be in a position to build on that.

                                What Klopp won't have expected is Skrtel to turn in that absolute cluster**** of a performance. And why should he? Regardless of his perceived ability, he's a seasoned international with a number of years experience!

                                Klopp made the call and yeah, he has to shoulder some blame, but that's Skrtel. And seeing people refusing to accept his limited ability and focus all the blame on to Klopp is making my toes curl.
                                The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.

                                Comment

                                Working...