Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tim Henman

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    His best chance was in 2001 and when he played Ivanisovic in the final as there was a stage when it looked like he could win the match as he was playing very well, but the constant rain delays in that match seemed to totally lose his momentum and it just wasn't to be.

    Comment


      #17
      henman the almost man. i hate the way he clenches his fist when he gets a point trying to play up to the crowd what a loser!
      I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by simey85 View Post
        henman the almost man. i hate the way he clenches his fist when he gets a point trying to play up to the crowd what a loser!
        But he won.
        .
        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



        May the Lord bless this post.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
          But he won.
          Never let the truth get in the way of a good story Neil
          **** OFF HICKS AND GILLETT WE DON'T WANT YOU.

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by Pacman View Post
            Never let the truth get in the way of a good story Neil
            I am happy to shake your hand, despite your badmouthing my motives yesterday in the "Glove is a renegade" threads.

            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
              I am happy to shake your hand, despite your badmouthing my motives yesterday in the "Glove is a renegade" threads.

              I'm sorry I just felt rejected because you wouldn't hold my hand
              **** OFF HICKS AND GILLETT WE DON'T WANT YOU.

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by Pacman View Post
                I'm sorry I just felt rejected because you wouldn't hold my hand
                It's good that you can recognise it and also feel able to say it.
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                  It's good that you can recognise it and also feel able to say it.
                  That I'm a reject?
                  **** OFF HICKS AND GILLETT WE DON'T WANT YOU.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by Pacman View Post
                    That I'm a reject?
                    No, that you felt rejected and that this affected your behaviour yesterday.

                    You're not a reject - however you have to learn that not all adults are there to give you emotional support.

                    There, there.
                    .
                    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                    May the Lord bless this post.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                      But he won.
                      my point being he wont win wimbeldon!
                      I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by simey85 View Post
                        my point being he wont win wimbeldon!
                        Neither will you. Does that make you a loser?
                        .
                        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                        May the Lord bless this post.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                          Neither will you. Does that make you a loser?
                          i think it does
                          In Rafa I Trust

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                            Neither will you. Does that make you a loser?
                            i dont think so as i did not enter wimbeldon this year!
                            I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman.

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by simey85 View Post
                              i dont think so as i did not enter wimbeldon this year!


                              I know what you mean about Henman, I don't like him either.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by DeeGame View Post
                                i think it does
                                .
                                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                                May the Lord bless this post.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X