Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Darrell Hair and the $500,000

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Darrell Hair and the $500,000

    Darrell Hair offered to resign as an umpire in exchange for a payment of $500,000, the International Cricket Council has revealed.
    He made his offer in a letter to the ICC after last weekend's controversial end to the fourth Test at The Oval.

    ICC chief executive Malcolm Speed told a news conference in London that Hair had been under great stress.

    But he said he was satisfied Hair had not made the offer with any "dishonest, underhand or malicious intent".

    Speed added: "He was seeking to find a solution that was in the interests of the game."
    The future you have, tomorrow, won't be the same future you had, yesterday.

    #2
    genius
    "What's your favourite Beatles album then?"
    "I think I'd have to say....Best of the Beatles"

    Comment


      #3
      Makes himself look very honest, doesn't he!
      If we had some ham, we could have some ham and eggs .... if we had some eggs!

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by red_in_oz
        Makes himself look very honest, doesn't he!

        this is like a soap opera
        The future you have, tomorrow, won't be the same future you had, yesterday.

        Comment


          #5
          It's another extraordinary development. I just don't know what to make of it all!!
          Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso
            It's another extraordinary development. I just don't know what to make of it all!!
            he has taken it back i reckon he will get sacked
            The future you have, tomorrow, won't be the same future you had, yesterday.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by animal magic
              he has taken it back i reckon he will get sacked
              Well yeah but it's a bit late now. He's claiming he was under serious stress (fair enough, I'm sure he was) but there's no excuse for asking for half a million ******* quid in exchange for his resignation!!

              It's over for Hair, surely.
              Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by animal magic
                he has taken it back i reckon he will get sacked
                Hair today, gone tomorrow
                ' He has football in his blood ' said a scout who was trying sell a player to Liverpool. ' You may be right ' Shanks said, ' but it hasn't reached his legs yet '

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by 6sheep
                  Hair today, gone tomorrow
                  Nice!
                  Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso
                    Well yeah but it's a bit late now. He's claiming he was under serious stress (fair enough, I'm sure he was) but there's no excuse for asking for half a million ******* quid in exchange for his resignation!!

                    It's over for Hair, surely.
                    he says thats for 4 years work as a umpire
                    The future you have, tomorrow, won't be the same future you had, yesterday.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by 6sheep
                      Hair today, gone tomorrow

                      Like blood on iron

                      Comment


                        #12
                        He'll carry on, no doubt about it. I don't understand why he was targetted for the decision against Pakistan, it was a joint decision by both umpires and I think the Pakistan team used the fact that Hair has had allegations made against him in the past as the reason to target him. I have sympathy with Hair on this, he's been made to be the villain of the piece when in actual fact he did nothing wrong during that Test match. He played it by the book and got abuse for it. The other umpire didn't get any flack which is disturbing and one wonders whether there was any racial nature of the targeting of Hair.
                        Having said all that, he's just made himself out to be a complete tool by asking for this payment.
                        rnm is funny,funny like funny haha.

                        Goals 2006/7 (CS, PL, CL)
                        1: Agger, Bellamy, Fowler, Alonso, Garcia
                        2: Gonzalez, Kuyt, Riise
                        5: Crouch

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Here's the original transcripts.



                          I don't think he's done much wrong during the test. He had an issue and raised it. Pakistan chucked their rattles out of the pram when they should have just got on with it - a lot of the legendary reverse swing bowlers admit to scuffing the ball up in the past (Imran Khan for example), so the precedent is there.

                          It's funny watching Hair squirm around now. There's certainly no love lost there on m part. The sooner him and Steve "Blindasabat" Bucknor retire the better.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I think he was wrong to not continue the match to be honest. I know it was both umpires who reached the decision but if they had come out and carried on the game it would all have been forgotten and the public would have got a days extra play.
                            "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                            -- William Blake

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by dww
                              I think he was wrong to not continue the match to be honest. I know it was both umpires who reached the decision but if they had come out and carried on the game it would all have been forgotten and the public would have got a days extra play.
                              I understand that but as an umpire it's his paid duty to uphold the laws of the game, and not to twist them around for the sake of the crowd. If the laws of the game need updating, then so be it.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X