Now he has the word record for most wickets in test matches, eclipsing Shane Warnes record in 29 fewer matches than Warne.
But is he the greatest, or given his very 'unorthodox' action should he even have been allowed to bowl?
I must admit I think his action is dodgy but he has been cleared by the ICC to play so they must have been satisfied with the reasons for this unorthodox action.
Despite all the question marks he has an incredible record and is still going strong, so he has my grudging respect.
But is he the greatest, or given his very 'unorthodox' action should he even have been allowed to bowl?
I must admit I think his action is dodgy but he has been cleared by the ICC to play so they must have been satisfied with the reasons for this unorthodox action.
Despite all the question marks he has an incredible record and is still going strong, so he has my grudging respect.


Comment