Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Good fight by Amir, done well and didnt put a foot wrong
However, the other lad didnt seem interested in attacking him. Was he scared? He was on the defensive throughout the fight and seemed to be content to just last 12 rounds with him
Good fight by Amir, done well and didnt put a foot wrong
However, the other lad didnt seem interested in attacking him. Was he scared? He was on the defensive throughout the fight and seemed to be content to just last 12 rounds with him
That, as well as the fact that he just couldn't get near him because of Khan's constant jab, using his reach advantage
However, the other lad didnt seem interested in attacking him. Was he scared? He was on the defensive throughout the fight and seemed to be content to just last 12 rounds with him
He's a little rat basically so couldn't get near Khan.
Good fight by Amir, done well and didnt put a foot wrong
However, the other lad didnt seem interested in attacking him. Was he scared? He was on the defensive throughout the fight and seemed to be content to just last 12 rounds with him
i think that is all he wanted to do - Khans camp know he needed a test and if khan leathered him inside 5 rounds he would prob come unde rmore critiscm for fighting a has been, I wouldn't be suprised if St Clair was told to make it a 12 round fight, not that i think boxing is corrupt or anything
i own everton fans on the internet....that's what i do
I saw one guy under instruction not to fight back and the other having a 12 round sparring session.
It was a farce.
Exactly. I notice people talking about Amir's reach advantage but watch it again. The other lad didnt get aggressive once. Even towards the last 3/4 rounds when it was clear that Amir had killed him on points you would have expected to see St Clair try to knock him out. But no he carried on defending
Comment