The Wrestling Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Alex
    Administrator
    • Jul 2006
    • 37058

    #2221
    Originally posted by MrShawnMichaels
    I think that's a bit revisionist, if you don't mind me saying. Sure he is a very very good worker but he's had just as much **** matches as he has had excellent ones. For the ****, watch (or don't) Summerslam 94. For the excellent, it's Shawn Michaels last year or previous.
    Ok ok, let me qualify what I meant there. For the last 7-5 years he has been consistantly good. Everyone has bad matches.
    *Except Michael, who died.

    Comment

    • greystoneslfc
      Houllier
      • Sep 2006
      • 315

      #2222
      Originally posted by MrShawnMichaels
      I think that's a bit revisionist, if you don't mind me saying. Sure he is a very very good worker but he's had just as much **** matches as he has had excellent ones. For the ****, watch (or don't) Summerslam 94. For the excellent, it's Shawn Michaels last year or previous.
      I don't recall who his opponent was for SM 94, was it Giant Gonzales? Undertaker is an absolute beast, and most of WWE have said their best ever matches were against him. True, he's getting old, but he brings out the absolute best in his 'opponents'. Has done for a long time! (just check my avatar & see what I think about Taker)
      The peanut. Mans only natural predator.

      Tallaght - the only place where a woman can be a MILF and jailbait at the same time.

      Comment

      • Drago
        Hodgsoned
        • Oct 2010
        • 3940

        #2223
        I'm pretty sure summerslam 94 was Taker against the fake Taker. Or was that 95?

        Comment

        • bradsdad
          Benitez
          • Aug 2006
          • 548

          #2224
          Originally posted by Alex
          I was talking pure wrestling ability. Triple H cant wrestle that well compared to those guys. He can do it well. But those 4 were the best of the modern era.
          alex i agree mostly with what you are sayin and taker does put on good shows but i dont think he has the pure wrestling ability of the others you mention yet i think HHH does have the ability also alot of wrestlers will say HHH not only is that good but goes out of his way to make the other wrestlers look good which is also a skill in itself thats why he is the game....anyway if the rock is back i will start watching again allthough i cant see it ever being the same as when it was the rock ...stone cold... angle..HHH...shawn...taker...jericho....edge&chris tian..etc etc...good times eh

          Comment

          • IN_RAFA_WE_TRUST
            Hodgsoned
            • Jun 2010
            • 8405

            #2225
            YOU GUYS ARE REALLY INTO THIS ****

            Comment

            • Vermilion
              Shooterista
              • Dec 2007
              • 32026

              #2226

              Comment

              • greystoneslfc
                Houllier
                • Sep 2006
                • 315

                #2227
                Originally posted by Drago
                I'm pretty sure summerslam 94 was Taker against the fake Taker. Or was that 95?
                You could very well be right. Sure was a World Cup year, probably didn't see it myself anyway!
                The peanut. Mans only natural predator.

                Tallaght - the only place where a woman can be a MILF and jailbait at the same time.

                Comment

                • Imy
                  Jalebi Cook
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 15883

                  #2228
                  Originally posted by greystoneslfc
                  I don't recall who his opponent was for SM 94, was it Giant Gonzales? Undertaker is an absolute beast, and most of WWE have said their best ever matches were against him. True, he's getting old, but he brings out the absolute best in his 'opponents'. Has done for a long time! (just check my avatar & see what I think about Taker)

                  It was WrestleMania 9 from the outdoor Caesars palace where taker faced the horrendous Giant Gonzalez.
                  We come not to play.

                  Comment

                  • MrShawnMichaels
                    Fagan
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 1120

                    #2229
                    Originally posted by Drago
                    I'm pretty sure summerslam 94 was Taker against the fake Taker. Or was that 95?
                    I

                    Comment

                    • MrShawnMichaels
                      Fagan
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 1120

                      #2230
                      Originally posted by bradsdad
                      alex i agree mostly with what you are sayin and taker does put on good shows but i dont think he has the pure wrestling ability of the others you mention yet i think HHH does have the ability also alot of wrestlers will say HHH not only is that good but goes out of his way to make the other wrestlers look good which is also a skill in itself thats why he is the game....anyway if the rock is back i will start watching again allthough i cant see it ever being the same as when it was the rock ...stone cold... angle..HHH...shawn...taker...jericho....edge&chris tian..etc etc...good times eh
                      On the contrary. Triple H does his best to bury ANY talent around him. He's more detestable than Cena in that sense. There was a period around 2004-07 (without the crappy DX ****) where he would just annihilate anything around him. Triple H is not one to make someone else look good. The best in the business currently in putting someone over are Angle, Bryan (he made DiBiase, Ziggler, Miz look terrific) and Jericho (once he returns)
                      I

                      Comment

                      • bradsdad
                        Benitez
                        • Aug 2006
                        • 548

                        #2231
                        Originally posted by MrShawnMichaels
                        On the contrary. Triple H does his best to bury ANY talent around him. He's more detestable than Cena in that sense. There was a period around 2004-07 (without the crappy DX ****) where he would just annihilate anything around him. Triple H is not one to make someone else look good. The best in the business currently in putting someone over are Angle, Bryan (he made DiBiase, Ziggler, Miz look terrific) and Jericho (once he returns)
                        i totally agree about angle...do you ever see him coming back to wwe ... and why did he leave also what is your view on christian i think he is badly underated

                        Comment

                        • MrShawnMichaels
                          Fagan
                          • Feb 2010
                          • 1120

                          #2232
                          Originally posted by bradsdad
                          i totally agree about angle...do you ever see him coming back to wwe ... and why did he leave also what is your view on christian i think he is badly underated
                          Never say never in wrestling. Sable sued Vince and she still got a job in 2003. If there was one guy they'd take from TNA, it would be him over anyone else. He can deliver an excellent promo and is one of the best workers in the business, providing he lays off the prescriptions. Yeah, I like Christian. Very solid performer and seems to have the crowd in the palm of his hand. Vince has never been convinced on him which is a shame. His best work was with Cena and Jericho before he left in 2004, I think and that was for a title building feud.
                          I

                          Comment

                          • IN_RAFA_WE_TRUST
                            Hodgsoned
                            • Jun 2010
                            • 8405

                            #2233
                            Having a wee laugh to myself when I was reading the last couple of posts and remembered papa Shango? And kumala? kumala? Kumala is a wine so I might have got the name wrong.

                            Comment

                            • red evil kenevil
                              Houllier
                              • Jan 2011
                              • 480

                              #2234
                              Originally posted by IN_RAFA_WE_TRUST
                              YOU GUYS ARE REALLY INTO THIS ****
                              Never got into this ****e,but every1 to there own
                              Cheeky monkey

                              Comment

                              • Alex
                                Administrator
                                • Jul 2006
                                • 37058

                                #2235
                                Originally posted by IN_RAFA_WE_TRUST
                                YOU GUYS ARE REALLY INTO THIS ****
                                If you have nothing to contribute to this then dont bother. People like different things. Im sure there are plenty of threads that you might be able to offer opinion in.
                                *Except Michael, who died.

                                Comment

                                Working...