Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso
View Post
Bopara out for three. Why do I bother posting in these threads...
-
You are India's lucky charm
In Rafa I Trust
-
SECOND ONE-DAY INTERNATIONAL, Indore:
India 292-9 (50 overs) bt England 238 all out (47 overs) by 54 runs
In Rafa I TrustComment
-
Eng 238 all out, INDIA WIN BY 54 RUNSWe come not to play.Comment
-
Bowler O M R W
Yuvraj 10.0 0 28 4
We come not to play.Comment
-
India must be getting worried since that's a big improvement by England. They lost the last one by 104 runs more so, if progress is linear, they'll win the next one by 50 runs.Originally posted by Imy View Post
Of course it isn't and of course they won't..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
In Rafa I TrustComment
-
Yep, he really is crap..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
for someone who supposedly hates cricket, you seem to know a lot about the game & regularly post in the cricket threadsOriginally posted by Neil Young View PostIndia must be getting worried since that's a big improvement by England. They lost the last one by 104 runs more so, if progress is linear, they'll win the next one by 50 runs.
Of course it isn't and of course they won't.
In Rafa I TrustComment
-
Don't understand England, surely they should have taken some more spinners to India?We come not to play.Comment
-
How dare you?!Originally posted by DeeGame View Postfor someone who supposedly hates cricket, you seem to know a lot about the game & regularly post in the cricket threads
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Instead of all the spanners, eh?Originally posted by Imy View Post.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
We come not to play.Comment
-
-
-
totally agree, and he had a bad back!Originally posted by The_Milkman View PostYuvi, what a star 
"Who's your Daddy now?"
LFC Champions one season someday
Jurgen Klopp is just boss
Semi retired poster
twitter: @parmsahota
insta:@parm78
Comment
Comment