A pointless debate, I know, but in light of the great Roger Federer's win at Roland Garros, who do you think is the greater sportsman? And why?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who is the greatest?
Collapse
X
-
Tough question that.
I would say Fed has more technical ability and ease in his play where as Tiger has more determination and grit in his game to get out of tough situations and pull something special off.
Probably Roger I reckon but hard to compare them in different fields, was it your mate who had the money on him to win this week?
Should have an exbhition match 6 holes of golf, 6 games of tennis although it would end 6-6.
Comment
-
Guest
Impossible to determine. Two different sports requiring different characteristics to be successful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Reece View PostIt is pretty much impossible to split, but I've gone for Fed because I just love watching him play with his willy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by captainfog View PostI voted for Fed because Golf isn't a sport

It's a walk in a park with a game of darts..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pablo1981 View PostTiger Woods for me. Federer isnt even the best in his own sport currently where as Tiger is simply unrivalled.Thats unfair though because even old men can play top level golf, where as Tennis is a younger man's game.Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso View Post
We come not to play.
Comment
RAFA 

Comment