Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US Open

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 6
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 template Next
    #76
    Originally posted by The Erectile Banana View Post
    It did matter though, as it brought him match point. If he'd missed it would have been 15-30 and Djokovic may have had a chance of holding serve.

    I think it's a thing of beauty because Federer did it. The man is so graceful that he has almost elevated tennis to an art form. Some of the shots he hits are out of this world. If any other player had pulled this off it may have been written off as a fluke, but because it was Fed, the most technically gifted player of his generation and possibly all time, it will go down as one of the great shots.
    I see what you're saying...

    ..but nah.

    .
    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



    May the Lord bless this post.

    Comment

      #77
      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
      I see what you're saying...

      ..but nah.



      Fair enough.

      A humble guy with healthy desire.

      Comment

        #78
        Del Potro 2-0 up in final set. He's got an awesome forehand.

        how crap is this crowd, do they ever shut up.

        Comment

          #79
          Fed well and truely pumped in the final set. Del potro at the age of 20, to beat Nadal and Fed. Take a bow son. Look on Murray.

          Comment

            #80
            Originally posted by 112 View Post
            Fed well and truely pumped in the final set. Del potro at the age of 20, to beat Nadal and Fed. Take a bow son. Look on Murray.
            He didnt just beat nadal either, he put on a boxing glove and fisted him
            "These stories have as much relation to the truth as an egg to a chestnut." - Racing Santander President Francisco Pernia

            Comment

              #81
              Originally posted by The Erectile Banana View Post
              It did matter though, as it brought him match point. If he'd missed it would have been 15-30 and Djokovic may have had a chance of holding serve.

              I think it's a thing of beauty because Federer did it. The man is so graceful that he has almost elevated tennis to an art form. Some of the shots he hits are out of this world. If any other player had pulled this off it may have been written off as a fluke, but because it was Fed, the most technically gifted player of his generation and possibly all time, it will go down as one of the great shots.

              Comment

                #82
                Originally posted by Darkon View Post
                Bah, much good it did him. What a loser.

                Tiger Woods
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment

                  #83
                  Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                  Bah, much good it did him. What a loser.

                  Tiger Woods
                  I'm sure the conversation between Woods and Fed is pretty good. One is waiting to become all-time great and one is at the moment

                  Comment

                    #84
                    Wow, great win for Del Potro.

                    To be the best you've gotta beat the best, and he did just that.
                    I could not dig, I dared not rob:
                    Therefore I lied to please the mob.
                    Now all my lies are proved untrue
                    And I must face the men I slew.
                    What tale shall serve me here among
                    Mine angry and defrauded young?

                    Comment

                      #85
                      Originally posted by 112 View Post
                      I'm sure the conversation between Woods and Fed is pretty good. One is waiting to become all-time great and one is at the moment
                      To be fair, they're clearly both all-time greats. One is just greater than the other.

                      I see the greatest won againt this weekend.
                      Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                      Comment

                        #86
                        Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
                        To be fair, they're clearly both all-time greats. One is just greater than the other.

                        I see the greatest won againt this weekend.
                        Fed lost???

                        I see Tiger missed the cut 2 Majors ago and threw away a lead at the last Major.

                        Comment

                          #87
                          Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
                          To be fair, they're clearly both all-time greats. One is just greater than the other.

                          I see the greatest won againt this weekend.
                          I've rarely seen you make a spelling mistake Shags. Don't let your standards drop.

                          Comment

                            #88
                            Originally posted by 112 View Post
                            I'm sure the conversation between Woods and Fed is pretty good. One is waiting to become all-time great and one is at the moment
                            They both need to be shot for taking part in those f*cking Gillette ads.
                            .
                            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                            May the Lord bless this post.

                            Comment

                            Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 template Next
                            Working...
                            X