Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wimbledon 2011

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Cool, I should be home by then. Got a few beers in the fridge so that's my Friday evening sorted.

    Comment


      Has he lost yet?
      .
      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



      May the Lord bless this post.

      Comment


        Have you lost it yet?

        Comment




          He stands a chance of course. I was just winding up the North Britons on the board.

          .
          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



          May the Lord bless this post.

          Comment


            well it's Henman all over again, a solid semi-finalist through his career, but enough to keep the hopes up and sell tickets

            Comment




              Nice try but I'm no proud Englishman. Dogs recognise no borders.

              Except border collies obviously. We can spot them a mile off.
              .
              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



              May the Lord bless this post.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Darkon View Post
                well it's Henman all over again, a solid semi-finalist through his career, but enough to keep the hopes up and sell tickets
                The difference being that Murray isn't a bottler anymore. He is now a real fighter and he really believe that he can win against a player like Nadal.

                I still think Murray will win the title.
                Stop the cyberhate


                from now on I will skip talking about our finances. That is a promise and will save myself from looking like a

                Susan Black

                Comment


                  I still think he'll get mullered by a one legged Nadal today.
                  Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

                  Comment


                    He has no chance, hope Nadal destroys him. He already started wincing in his match against Lopez.
                    Are we winning?

                    Comment


                      Jean Wilfried
                      Are we winning?

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by Arn View Post
                        The difference being that Murray isn't a bottler anymore.
                        Yes, he is.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by JohnDoe View Post
                          Yes, he is.
                          Have you seen him wincing against Lopez?
                          Are we winning?

                          Comment


                            He was wincing because he had a slight injury. What's that got to do with him being a bottler or not?

                            Comment


                              Nothing to do with wincing. An 0-9 set record in grand slam finals is what says it.

                              Comment


                                I think Murray is a good player but he sounds drunk when he talks.
                                .
                                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                                May the Lord bless this post.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X