Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
By the way, it's not much of a spectacle really. It is if you're into the sport, and know who's good and who isn't, but otherwise it's just a succession of people in skinsuits riding space age bikes and not moving about much as they pedal. The drama comes in the split times.
So let's hope the OBS and Locog don't f*ck up the on screen timings this time.
By the way, as you'll have noticed, the favourites start at the end, to keep the drama. It can help them too since they can get updates on how they're doing compared to others.
But someone with Wiggins' experience knows they have to go flat out all the way anyway, and it's just a question of managing and maintaining their effort. If it's good enough, he wins; if it isn't then knowing someone else is doing better doesn't change anything.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
They had about 5 points in a row where serves went straight into the net
Olympics badminton: Four pairs charged with not trying
The Badminton World Federation has charged eight Olympic doubles players with "not using one's best efforts to win a match".
Four pairs of players - two from South Korea, one from China and one from Indonesia - could be disciplined.
Constant errors, including players serving into the net, took place.
All four pairs had already qualified for the last eight, and they have been accused of wanting to lose in an attempt to manipulate the draw.
At Wembley Arena on Tuesday night, fans jeered the women's doubles match between China's Yu Yang and Wang Xiaoli and South Koreans Jung Kyung-eun and Kim Ha-na .
The longest rally in the first game lasted four shots, with match referee Thorsten Berg coming onto court at one point to warn the players.
South Korea won the Group A match, which lasted 23 minutes 21-14 21-11.
Both pairs were already through to the quarter-finals with the winners to face China's Tian Quing and Zhao Yunlei. The two Chinese pairings can now only meet in the final.
Korea's coach Sung Han-kook said said: "The Chinese started this. They did it first. It's a complicated thing with the draws. They didn't want to meet each other in the semi-final, they don't want that to happen.
"They (BWF) should do something about that."
But Yu said the Chinese decided to preserve energy ahead of the knockout stages.
She said: "Actually these opponents really were strong. This is the first time we've played them and tomorrow it's the knockout rounds, so we've already qualified and we wanted to have more energy for the knockout rounds."
A later match between South Korean third seeds Ha Jung-Eun and Kim Min-Jung and Indonesian pair Meiliana Juahari and Greysia Polii was played out in a similar atmosphere.
Referee Berg returned to court and brandished the black card, signalling disqualification, but it was rescinded and the match resumed when the Indonesians protested.
Both pairs had also already qualified for the knockout stages, with the winner of Group C to play Yu and Wang and the Korean pairs to face each other if Ha and Kim lost.
The Koreans won 18-21 21-14 21-12 and did not comment before leaving the court, but Polii told reporters: "I don't know what happened. If that's the game, we have to accept all the things.
"Either they want to trust us - we play bad or we play good. Our control is only to play as good as we can."
Gail Emms, a Badminton Olympic silver medallist for Great Britain in 2004, who was at the event for BBC Sport, said: "I'm furious. It is very embarrassing for our sport.
"This is the Olympic Games. If Badminton wants to save face they should disqualify the two pairs and reinstate the pairs that came third in the group. This is something that is not acceptable. The crowd paid good money to watch two matches."
The International Olympic Committee said it had "every confidence" in the badminton federation to "deal with the issue appropriately and take any necessary measures".
Analysis
Gordon Farquhar
BBC sports news correspondent The Badminton World Federation will meet this morning to decide what to do. Their lacklustre efforts drew boos and chanting from the crowd, and irate intervention from match officials, as a series of tame shots were played. Two teams were disqualified then reinstated and confusion reigned. The Chinese state media say separate proceedings have begun against their players, publishing an editorial saying the spirit of fair play was more important than a gold medal
I must say there's a certain sense of schadenfreude in the British results so far. For once, the great expectations were justified, due to the home ground advantage and the talent/ability of your athletes, so as an Australian it's nice to see the British stay true to form. Especially after the sour grapes of the road race, as if it's 1788 and we owe something to our colonial masters.
I don't see Australia anywhere on the medals table either
I think they must have won the road race. Why else would an Australian take pleasure in the result?
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
I don't see Australia anywhere on the medals table either
I expected as much coming in, and now that we're delivering a lack of success I have turned some of my attention to Britain's similarly poor results. Take pleasure where you can find it.
I think they must have won the road race. Why else would an Australian take pleasure in the result?
My pleasure comes from the British fallout to the result (and other subsequent failings), not the result itself, as we are similarly disappointed in how our countrymen fared.
Comment