Smith, Amla and Kallis all played monumental innings, pretty much saw off everything England could throw at them... Actually DID see off everything England could throw at them.
On the Saturday I was there you could easily see the problem. Lack off options. Against teams with a decent batting line up England need to have 5 front line bowlers. Once they had seen off Anderson and Swann a few loose overs from Broad - Bresnan not really creating much and you couldn't see what England could do to make the breakthrough.
Given that Prior, Bresnan, Swann and Broad are all capable of getting a few runs and the fact that the number 6 position is proving difficult to fill this decision should be a no brainer.
Drop Bopara, and replace him with Finn.
Its a shame (disgraceful) that it is only a 3 match test series. But England will need to improve massively to win or draw the series and will find it hard to stop SA replacing them as the no 1 Test side in the World.
Even allowing for this, SA strong favorites after such a crushing win. Fearsome batting line up with ridiculously high batting averages against England.
Be amazed if they play 5 bowlers having gone with 4 for such a long time. They will also point to the collapse in the first innings and the poor showing in the second as a reason for playing an extended batting line up
Be amazed if they play 5 bowlers having gone with 4 for such a long time. They will also point to the collapse in the first innings and the poor showing in the second as a reason for playing an extended batting line up
i agree it would be a massive change, but as it stands SA are the most formidable opponents England have faced in a long time. If they go with 4 against that batting line up, I think they will lose again.
It makes sense for other reasons though, as the 6th batsmen (be it Morgan, Bopara, Bairstow) haven't contributed.
I think SA are in a commanding position and it will take an incredible effort for England to pull it back from here (particularly in a 3 test series)
i agree it would be a massive change, but as it stands SA are the most formidable opponents England have faced in a long time. If they go with 4 against that batting line up, I think they will lose again.
It makes sense for other reasons though, as the 6th batsmen (be it Morgan, Bopara, Bairstow) haven't contributed.
I think SA are in a commanding position and it will take an incredible effort for England to pull it back from here (particularly in a 3 test series)
For the 4 bowler attack to work at least 3 have to be pretty much on top form and taking wickets also Swann needs to tie down one end to allow the seamers to rotate. He seems to have had a slight dip in form.
If only we had an all rounder to bat at 4 and take some crucial wickets.
They were debating Kallis on the Sky coverage with a couple of them saying he is the best all rounder to play the game.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Consistently a threat with bat and ball. When he came in on sat - the score board showed his average being about 60 and a total of 12,000 career runs...
Well, we've all done that to ourselves, haven't we?
Sobers was a great athlete - he could bowl spin as well as fast, a brilliant attacking batsman, great fielder, great captain...
Plus he isn't South Efrican.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment