If they're going to play it all outdoors then they need to move it to March.
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post. -
If they're going to play it all outdoors then they need to move it to another country.Originally posted by Neil Young View PostModifying post.Comment
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Can they just not have jets of flame firing across the roof line, vaporising the rain as it falls?*Except Michael, who died.Comment
-
Although actually, maybe they should just play whatever the weather. It might make it more interesting..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Federer may be good in Australia but how can he handle a cold wet wednesday in StokeOriginally posted by Neil Young View PostComment
-
Good idea. Would be good to watch too. Extra point if you can get the ball vaporized by the flames!Originally posted by Alex View Post
Actually would this just create a heavy layer of mist? And the Wimbledon hawk that scares away the birds would need to keep his wits about him.Modifying post.Comment
-
-
Mmmm, roast hawk, gahhh...Originally posted by Buzzo View Post.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
MMmm.Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
Main Course: Roast Hawk.
Desert: Tika Taka Pudding.
Whats for starters and amuse-bouche though.Modifying post.Comment
-
Sozzled bridesmaid could be on the menu..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Federer looks great. *4-2 up.Comment
-
Federer in serving god mode, wins the first set 6-3.
Nobody can beat him on grass in this form. Hope he keeps it up.Comment
-
Fed wins the 1st set
Looks pretty comfortable so farComment
-
Federer wins first set 6/3. He's not hanging about either.
I want five sets so I can see Murray's game when I get home.Modifying post.Comment
Comment