After this long, you may as well have tried to brazen it out.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Ha. I'm just not posting that capably these days.
You chaps seem to be getting on well without my input though.
'have' ...
Ah Buttso, it's probably just a phase you're going through. We're all sure you'll make it in the end. Except Nige of course but he's an idiot.
"Have"?
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment