55-3 bit of a recovery and what a take for the 3rd wicket from Pollard
-
-
Modifying post.Comment
-
Would be an opportune time to call for a world class big hitting fast scoring batsman.Modifying post.Comment
-
is there one of those kicking about not doing much at the moment?
Comment
-
84 needed from 36 balls. Fair to say they have misjudged this somewhat.Modifying post.Comment
-
He must be enjoying this, maybe his importance over the last 7 years will begin to get some acknowledgement, they need him.Originally posted by rcasemore View Post is there one of those kicking about not doing much at the moment?Modifying post.Comment
-
So we're back to England being **** in all forms. Oh well it was fun while it lasted
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’Comment
-
Decent lil cameo from Morgan here
Patience when teased often, transforms into rageComment
-
the fielding from the the Windies has been superbComment
-
Eion Morgan has something special cooking here
Patience when teased often, transforms into rageComment
-
Probably over now. 18 off 3 needed.Patience when teased often, transforms into rageComment
-
Could have won it if they'd gone a bit earlier - left themselves with too much to do.Modifying post.Comment
-
Originally posted by Shaggy View PostSo we're back to England being **** in all forms. Oh well it was fun while it lasted
Hodgson's magic touch reaches further than we'd imagined.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
There is too much cricket. I can't keep up. Just paying attention to the Test Side is much easier. Of course, if England get to the final ill watch though
*Except Michael, who died.Comment
-
If I were you I wouldn't turn down any social invitations that might clash with it..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
Comment