Cricket

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shaggy
    Unidentified Rascal
    • Jul 2006
    • 135533

    #46
    It is but if it's a choice of two from Lara, Sachin and IVA Richards then he misses out every time for me. And Richards would be my first pick.
    Thanks very much for being

    Comment

    • captainfog
      Lord Anthony Rivers
      • Dec 2006
      • 30746

      #47
      Originally posted by Shaggy
      Viv Richards, Sachin, Marshall, Wasim Akram and Warne are absolute shoo-ins. Seen a lot of folk picking all time XIs recently and the number of people who overlook Wasim is ridiculous. Clearly didn't see him play.
      If that side didn't have Barnes then who would you have?

      McGrath? Holding? Waqar? Botham?
      https://www.needlesandgrooves.com/

      https://twitter.com/NeedlesNGrooves

      Comment

      • Shaggy
        Unidentified Rascal
        • Jul 2006
        • 135533

        #48
        Originally posted by captainfog
        If that side didn't have Barnes then who would you have?

        McGrath? Holding? Waqar? Botham?
        I don't know who Barnes is either. Tough out of that lot - I'd eliminate Botham first. Man it's too difficult. I'd even throw Hadlee into the equation.
        Thanks very much for being

        Comment

        • captainfog
          Lord Anthony Rivers
          • Dec 2006
          • 30746

          #49
          Originally posted by Shaggy
          I don't know who Barnes is either. Tough out of that lot - I'd eliminate Botham first. Man it's too difficult. I'd even throw Hadlee into the equation.
          What about Ambrose?!
          https://www.needlesandgrooves.com/

          https://twitter.com/NeedlesNGrooves

          Comment

          • Shaggy
            Unidentified Rascal
            • Jul 2006
            • 135533

            #50
            Was gonna say him too but changed my mind cos he doesn't beat Holding IMO. Difficult though. Impossible in fact.
            Thanks very much for being

            Comment

            • EwarWoo
              Paisley
              • Apr 2007
              • 15979

              #51
              Happy to be schooled by an historian of the game or someone who remembers the 70's, but why the heck is Gilly not keeping wicket?

              Both a great cricketer (on paper his stats are better than Knott's) and one of the most exciting to watch even in this modern era of slap and tickle.

              Comment

              • Shaggy
                Unidentified Rascal
                • Jul 2006
                • 135533

                #52
                Huge fan of Gilchrist I was. He'd get in my team ahead of Knott, although to be fair I never saw him play.
                Thanks very much for being

                Comment

                • captainfog
                  Lord Anthony Rivers
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 30746

                  #53
                  I think on pure keeping skills Knott was supposed to be the best and lets be honest, with that top 6 it's not as if that side needs Gilly's batting
                  https://www.needlesandgrooves.com/

                  https://twitter.com/NeedlesNGrooves

                  Comment

                  • captainfog
                    Lord Anthony Rivers
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 30746

                    #54
                    I'm going Botham at 7 and Knott at 8 Beefy was quick as **** before his injuries, got over 380 wickets and is widely regarded as the games greatest all-rounder. Get him in the side **** off Barnes
                    https://www.needlesandgrooves.com/

                    https://twitter.com/NeedlesNGrooves

                    Comment

                    • Tee
                      El Pistolero
                      • Jul 2006
                      • 35788

                      #55
                      Originally posted by Shaggy
                      It is but if it's a choice of two from Lara, Sachin and IVA Richards then he misses out every time for me. And Richards would be my first pick.


                      Richards was in a league of his own.
                      "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

                      Comment

                      • Tee
                        El Pistolero
                        • Jul 2006
                        • 35788

                        #56
                        I am biased but there has to be a place for Imran Khan in that team IMO.

                        88 tests, averaging 22.81 with the ball and 37.69 with the bat. Aside from that he was a magnificent captain of a team. My favourite cricketer of all time, actually the greatest Pakistani player of all time (even Wasim would admit that).
                        "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

                        Comment

                        • Shaggy
                          Unidentified Rascal
                          • Jul 2006
                          • 135533

                          #57
                          I don't know how their numbers compare without checking (can't be arsed) but I always grudgingly felt Imran Khan had the tiniest of edges over Botham. That era of all-rounders was unbelievable - Imran, Beefy, Kapil Dev and you could arguably include the great Richard Hadlee too (I always saw him as much more of a bowler than an all-rounder...a demon fast bowler who could bat).
                          Thanks very much for being

                          Comment

                          • captainfog
                            Lord Anthony Rivers
                            • Dec 2006
                            • 30746

                            #58
                            No code has to be inserted here.
                            https://www.needlesandgrooves.com/

                            https://twitter.com/NeedlesNGrooves

                            Comment

                            • captainfog
                              Lord Anthony Rivers
                              • Dec 2006
                              • 30746

                              #59
                              Best allrounders in Tests (Qual: 2000 runs and 200 wkts)

                              No code has to be inserted here.
                              https://www.needlesandgrooves.com/

                              https://twitter.com/NeedlesNGrooves

                              Comment

                              • captainfog
                                Lord Anthony Rivers
                                • Dec 2006
                                • 30746

                                #60
                                Botham was awesome to begin with and his stats clearly show how injury took their toll:

                                No code has to be inserted here.No code has to be inserted here.****ed that table up a bit, but you can see what I mean.

                                Compared to Imran:

                                No code has to be inserted here.
                                Last edited by captainfog; 25-10-13, 06:41 PM.
                                https://www.needlesandgrooves.com/

                                https://twitter.com/NeedlesNGrooves

                                Comment

                                Working...