Cricket

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shaggy
    Unidentified Rascal
    • Jul 2006
    • 135533

    #106
    Originally posted by Daniel 7
    How many times do two countries have to play each other before you get bored of it? It just seems to be a constant stream on the news / sky sports of England v Australia

    Is the entire sport really just England v Australia and thats all that happens? Everything else in the game of cricket is just a build up to England v Australia?

    How many ashes actually are there? They must be running out by now surely, or are they constantly burning stuff to give out at the next instalment?

    I thought the SPL was bad, but this is ridiculous. Its like a perpetual, sedated varsity boat race but with red balls, leisurely field activity and faux jingoism.


    Normally the Ashes are contested once every two years, alternating home and away of course. For some reason - and I am still in the dark as to why this has happened - this summer's home series is being followed almost immediately (gap of just 2-3 months) by the series down under.
    Thanks very much for being

    Comment

    • Alex
      Administrator
      • Jul 2006
      • 37058

      #107
      They usually play each other 10 times in 4 years. No different to football really.

      Its just that we had double ashes this year to allow for the world cup next.

      Obviously there is ODI cricket. But everyone plays each other all the time there. Australia and India had a 7 match series recently. I guess we will do the same too.
      *Except Michael, who died.

      Comment

      • Daniel 7
        Heretic
        • Mar 2008
        • 24088

        #108
        Come on, if England played Germany 10 times in 4 years at football there would be uproar! (Especially because they'd lose every game - imagine the damage to the fragile Ingerlish fan's psyche!)

        I suppose the other countries that play it like The Cayman Islands or Kenya can't afford to send their teams over very often.

        You'd think the Cricket Federation would stump up some cash for the colonies to come over or get the USA to play baseball over there and cricket here and vice versa. At least there would be some competition.

        Comment

        • Alex
          Administrator
          • Jul 2006
          • 37058

          #109
          It's no different to Rugby. Team play all the time due to the limited number of international sides.

          I'd rather watch England play Australia 20 times and have it be competitive than England play some small country with zero pedigree. It'd be like Liverpool constantly playing non league sides. It'd soon get boring.
          *Except Michael, who died.

          Comment

          • Daniel 7
            Heretic
            • Mar 2008
            • 24088

            #110
            But how are the ****ter countries supposed to get any better if they can't break into the colonial cartel of the cricket elite?

            See, this is where football sets itself apart from cricket (and other gash like Rugby Union, Rugby League and rounders) - its all inclusive, it embraces new nations, it welcomes them into the international brotherhood of competitive nation states. Then they get better and beat Scotland and consign them to never, ever being able to qualify for another tournament ever again.

            Comment

            • Alex
              Administrator
              • Jul 2006
              • 37058

              #111
              They get better through ODI and T20 matches and lesser internationals.

              The trouble with Cricket is that its not an international sport is it? Its a bit like asking GB to go up against the US in basketball and then making an international spectacle of it. Its pointless.

              Football is the only real global sport out there. But that's because it only needs 2 people and a thing resembling a ball to be a game. Cricket is basically a British game taught to the colonies/empire in order for our old toffs to have a bit of a knock about. Its snowballed from there.

              The restrictions of Test playing nations is maybe something that could be looked at. Currently there are only 9 or something. But again it comes down to the standard of the other teams.
              *Except Michael, who died.

              Comment

              • Daniel 7
                Heretic
                • Mar 2008
                • 24088

                #112
                I think the first thing that needs to be done, if its going to take off, is sort out the bad light. Just get some floodlights.

                Sort out googlies as well. Nobody can embrace a sport that uses googlies as a term.

                And introduce tackling to stop people completing their shuttle runs.

                Comment

                • Chazza
                  Des Lynam
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 31141

                  #113
                  And ban Scotland

                  Comment

                  • Daniel 7
                    Heretic
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 24088

                    #114
                    Scotland don't play ****ing cricket

                    Comment

                    • Daniel 7
                      Heretic
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 24088

                      #115
                      Originally posted by Alex
                      The restrictions of Test playing nations is maybe something that could be looked at. Currently there are only 9 or something. But again it comes down to the standard of the other teams.
                      Why don't the little nations just have their own tests?

                      Comment

                      • Alex
                        Administrator
                        • Jul 2006
                        • 37058

                        #116
                        What would be the point? Most countries either cant be bothered, or are totally ****. Itd be like 2 sunday league teams meeting for an International.
                        *Except Michael, who died.

                        Comment

                        • Chazza
                          Des Lynam
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 31141

                          #117
                          Originally posted by Daniel 7
                          Scotland don't play ****ing cricket




                          Cricket - Scotland cruise to victory
                          Scotland continued their preparations for this month's World Twenty20 qualifiers with a nine-wicket victory over Ragama in Sri Lanka on Monday.

                          Comment

                          • ChesterDave
                            Paisley
                            • Oct 2010
                            • 32224

                            #118
                            Originally posted by Daniel 7
                            Scotland don't play ****ing cricket
                            Nope, but they still field a team

                            Football without Origi is nothing

                            Comment

                            • Daniel 7
                              Heretic
                              • Mar 2008
                              • 24088

                              #119
                              What does that even mean?!

                              I heard about a team called Scotland but I was under the impression they were all english blokes who had no chance of ever playing for England.

                              Bit like football then

                              Nobody plays cricket in Scotland - nobody!

                              Comment

                              • Alex
                                Administrator
                                • Jul 2006
                                • 37058

                                #120
                                Calum MacLeod
                                That is the most Scottish name possible. I think you might be wrong....
                                *Except Michael, who died.

                                Comment

                                Working...