Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kate caught topless

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    just as well the gutter paps only had long lenses and not a .50 cal barrett.
    seen these getting fired on the future weapons programme
    removing all the weak links makes us stronger

    too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.

    Comment


      #47
      The BBC News lead story is illustrated by a new Kate and William topless photo.

      .
      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



      May the Lord bless this post.

      Comment


        #48
        Originally posted by baitman View Post
        just as well the gutter paps only had long lenses and not a .50 cal barrett.
        seen these getting fired on the future weapons programme
        I have fired the Barrett on many occasions, a scary weapon.
        Those that hid Anne Frank were breaking the law.
        Those that killed her, were following the law.

        Comment


          #49
          That's a gun, yeah?
          .
          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



          May the Lord bless this post.

          Comment


            #50
            Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
            That's a gun, yeah?
            A sniper rifle,
            Those that hid Anne Frank were breaking the law.
            Those that killed her, were following the law.

            Comment


              #51
              I suppose that's good. I thought you were being lewd (which would at least have been on topic).
              .
              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



              May the Lord bless this post.

              Comment


                #52
                Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                I suppose that's good. I thought you were being lewd (which would at least have been on topic).
                did you think barrett was Kev's pet name for his schlong
                removing all the weak links makes us stronger

                too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.

                Comment


                  #53
                  I wouldn't recognise Kate Middleton if I bumped into her, the pictures are completely pointless and my new girlfriend is much sexier! That's all I have to say. :-)

                  Comment


                    #54
                    We'll be the judges of that. Post some pics of her pups then.




                    Not really.
                    .
                    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                    May the Lord bless this post.

                    Comment


                      #55
                      Originally posted by Craig H
                      We'll be the judges of that. Post some pics of her pups then.
                      Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

                      Comment


                        #56
                        She doesn't have any pets. I think the future monarch looks okay, nothing special. As long as they're happy who cares?! Why are the press obsessed with nudity? Do we really need to know what a celebrity looks like naked? They are just human beings and we're all just human beings. It's pathetic, but if people are interested and there's a market for this then that is even more pathetic. A girl has tits, big deal - 50% of the human beings on this planet do too.

                        Comment


                          #57
                          Originally posted by Victor Mature View Post
                          She doesn't have any pets. I think the future monarch looks okay, nothing special. As long as they're happy who cares?! Why are the press obsessed with nudity? Do we really need to know what a celebrity looks like naked? They are just human beings and we're all just human beings. It's pathetic, but if people are interested and there's a market for this then that is even more pathetic. A girl has tits, big deal - 50% of the human beings on this planet do too.
                          Of course.

                          It reminds me of an old Viz cartoon, called Victor Mature.

                          Character: Hi Vic, wanna go and get pissed?

                          Victor Mature: No, I don't think so.
                          .
                          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                          May the Lord bless this post.

                          Comment


                            #58
                            I just think we should all enjoy tits in our own way! Half of us have them and the other half love them.

                            Comment


                              #59
                              Well yes, of course.

                              So tell us all about her then.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment


                                #60
                                There isn't an appropriate thread here and the slinky one really isn't the correct place! :-) I am head over heels although it seems slightly too early to feel this way. Time will tell. **** - I realise now you were just taking the piss!!! ;-)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X