Originally posted by Red Chilli
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
DIC have pulled out
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Eventually yes. But also to raise the profile of the Arab nation.Bill shankly to Tommy Smith after he'd turned up for training with a bandaged knee:
'Take that poof bandage off, and what do you mean YOUR knee, it's LIVERPOOL'S knee !'
"Sorry, boss, I should have kept my legs together," said Lawrence. "No, Tommy, your mother should have kept her legs together!," replied Shankly.
* After Tommy Lawrence had let in a fluke goal between his legs
-
DIC's out!
Sorry bazza, I don't buy that last bit. It's all about money.Originally posted by bazza76 View PostEventually yes. But also to raise the profile of the Arab nation.Originally posted by Gordon Brown
(1995)"A weak currency is the sign of a weak economy,which is the sign of a weak government"
Comment
-
Its obviously almost impossible for us to judge which of the 2 bids was the best for LFC.
If DIC was the better bid for the club & the board has tried to use Gillets interest to get DIC to increase their offer, then is a **** up of massive proportions.
If however, Gillets new bid is the better bid for LFC then everything in the garden is rosy. DIC have pulled the plug as a face saver before the club announced Gillet as its preferred bidder.
However, it all leaves a rather sour taste in the mouth. For so long DIC seemed the preferred bidder. Unless Gillet has come in with a better offer, it really is a **** up, big time.
Many of the reasons for fans prefering DIC are illogical. Gillet is seen as a Glazier clone, a money obsessed yank who will bleed the club dry. DIC on the other hand are seen as Arab gentlemen, LFC supporters at heart with LFC best interests paramount in their thoughts.
The truth is there is probably little to choose morally between the bidders. DIC would have been be every bit as ruthless as Gillet will be.
My only wish is that we are going with gillet as his offer was the best for LFC, rather than because we've ballsed up the DIC deal & are left with Hobsons choice. Truth is we will probably never know.AKA Heighway No9
Comment
-
I feel sorry for Parry, his job is to find investors, which he has done consistently, but all decisions rest with the shareholders, and I feel they are putting their interests before LFC"The definition of insanity is not running into the same wall again and again; it's expecting a different result every time you do it."
Comment
-
Obviously first option, but releasing statements to appease fans is not highest priority if we can take it for granted their working their socks off trying to sort out the investment scenario.Originally posted by anfieldanfield View PostWhat on earth is more important than the long term future of Liverpool football club ?
Some on loan backup defensive midfielder and a cut-price right back from Spain to cover Finnan...Wow.
Both the background work on investment and background work on signings ARE MORE IMPORTANT than releasing statments to the public.
We as fans just have to wait, simple as that.
Comment
-
however bad we think our lot are - and i don't agree that they're imbeciles - can you imagine freddie c/untin sheppard in his pie-juice stained oxfam suit thrashing out a deal with middle eastern royalty? "now ah like a fookin kebab as much as the next tha knows, so ah say 20 quid fort stadium, thermal underwear allowance fort foreign puffters, shwarma pie stands all overt park and 100 million for ronaldinho"Originally posted by PoolG View PostHeres what'll happen.DIC will take their money to a club like Newcastle and push us further down the pecking order.Gillet will complete due dilligence and then say he has to revise his offer downwards cos of the books but he'll really be doing it cos he's the only bidder and he has us over a barrel.We then have to accept his offer which will probably be similar to DIC's and we'll be taken over by a bloke who's hobby is going bankrupt.
Jesus this club does my head in sometimes.Felching ≠ Gerbilling
Comment
-
FLMAOOriginally posted by bloody and porcine View Posthowever bad we think our lot are - and i don't agree that they're imbeciles - can you imagine freddie sheppard in his pie-juice stained oxfam suit thrashing out a deal with middle eastern royalty? "now ah like a fookin kebab as much as the next tha knows, so ah say 20 quid fort stadium, thermal underwear allowance fort foreign puffters, shwarma pie stands all overt park and 100 million for ronaldinho"
Classic.I hate Polanski
Comment
-
and with that we should close the thread. respec to your brain and dry powder sir.Originally posted by Sir Bob View PostIts obviously almost impossible for us to judge which of the 2 bids was the best for LFC.
If DIC was the better bid for the club & the board has tried to use Gillets interest to get DIC to increase their offer, then is a **** up of massive proportions.
If however, Gillets new bid is the better bid for LFC then everything in the garden is rosy. DIC have pulled the plug as a face saver before the club announced Gillet as its preferred bidder.
However, it all leaves a rather sour taste in the mouth. For so long DIC seemed the preferred bidder. Unless Gillet has come in with a better offer, it really is a **** up, big time.
Many of the reasons for fans prefering DIC are illogical. Gillet is seen as a Glazier clone, a money obsessed yank who will bleed the club dry. DIC on the other hand are seen as Arab gentlemen, LFC supporters at heart with LFC best interests paramount in their thoughts.
The truth is there is probably little to choose morally between the bidders. DIC would have been be every bit as ruthless as Gillet will be.
My only wish is that we are going with gillet as his offer was the best for LFC, rather than because we've ballsed up the DIC deal & are left with Hobsons choice. Truth is we will probably never know.Felching ≠ Gerbilling
Comment
-
Or he remembers the Premier League press release a couple of weeks ago announcing the huge increase in TV rights and decided that made the club worth more than it was when DIC first made their bid a month ago?Originally posted by Red_Al_77 View PostGood point.
DIC did a good job of winning over the fans by convincing us it wasn't just a money decision for them.
Besides Rick Parry and the Board explaining why DIC suddenly isn't the best thing since sliced bread I wonder whether Gillet is going to make any efffort to reassure his future customers?
Comment
-
Maybe DIC have been told by Parry and mores to pull out to give the rest of the shareholders a kick up the backside, and they will come back in when the bioard wise up.
I suppose with Parry and Moores been told they can stay on with DIC then the rest of the board knowing they are out on their ar** will do everything they can to get the most out of it possible.
Steve Morgan is not going to give in easy and let Moores get what he wants.
Does anyone know how many shareholders there are?
We ca nthen work out the total difference in monmey which will be paid by Gillet. Then maybe Moores could swallow this debt himself or maybe DIC will up the offer.
I would have thought DIC will be gutted its not going through and also Parry and moores, so maybe now they can thrash it out between them.
At the end of the day we have no idea of the pro's and con's of the deals but i am just praying that something works out.
Didnt RAfa say he wanted DIC as he knew what they were going to offer him? Where will his thoughts be now?
There must be something stipid as Parry wouldnt have been on about it going through for so long and also for DIC men t obe on About it also.
Tomorrow is going to be interesting.
Good Night
Comment
-
1 question (which SouthAfricaRed touched on), if DIC were SO committed, why did they pull out at the sniff of a higher offer from another investor?
Surely if they had enough commitment to spend months feeding the PR machine and at the same time scrutinising the books with a team of financial experts, they wouldn't be blown off course by some cheeky American at the back of the room, tipping a wink to the guy with the hammer?
Comment
Comment