kenyon has often said that the idea is to be self sustaining- ie no needing roman's money- by 2010
no chance
no chance
-
"At a football club, there's a holy trinity - the players, the manager and the supporters. Directors don't come into it. They are only there to sign the cheques" -
Not with their wages they wont...........Originally posted by carrsim View PostWhen you feel like you're done, you are not alone........Comment
-
i don't know much about it either mate, just from the few articles i've readOriginally posted by Graybach View PostThe more I think where I saw/heard that I'm convinced I saw an interview on SkySports, I didn't make it up anyway
I'm sure it was towards the end of last season, when whoever it was being interviewed, was exlaining that the big spending was being curbed slightly as all the good work by Kenyon and the rest of the behind the scenes people had finally got Chelsea into a position where they were self-sustainable ( it must have been on the telly otherwise I wouldn't know what 'self-sustainable' was
)
However this might have been total bull**** from them. I'm sure you lot will know a lot more about it than me
but the last financial report i saw about chelski was that they were losing close to a 100M a season. and now that i think about it i do remember some quotes from chelsea brass saying that their goal was to be self sustaining and not so heavily reliant on roman's roubles
i'll try to dig up something factual
Comment
-
and there it isOriginally posted by carrsim View Post
i really should read the thread before posting
Comment
Comment