Originally posted by fredo
View Post
As for what I meant, I had a slip of the tongue. 
-
I think you should apologise, then we can all move on. And the mods can ban you from Est..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post. -
Originally posted by Neil Young View PostActually I didn't see her say it but I saw his reaction and her response. I was channel-surfing. Since I can't stand that programme I carried on riding the wave.
It's one of my favourite programmes, very rarely miss a show
Portillo has mellowed in his old age and Abbot is always good value. They make a good double act. Andrew Neil makes me chuckle too.
I agree though that at their worst Portillo and Neil can be odious creatures.
Comment
-
FTW = Fredo The W*nkerOriginally posted by dww View Post.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Originally posted by captainfog View Post
It's one of my favourite programmes, very rarely miss a show
Portillo has mellowed in his old age and Abbot is always good value. They make a good double act. Andrew Neil makes me chuckle too.
I agree though that at their worst Portillo and Neil can be odious creatures.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
This is a winner.Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
And what's so wrong about wanking anyway?
Comment
-
Rape has many different meanings tho, it is not just used with regards to sexual misdemeanour
verb (used with object)
6. to force to have sexual intercourse.
7. to plunder (a place); despoil.
8. to seize, take, or carry off by force.
So Pardew was legitimately using the word, not a problem.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scratch View Post
I thought about doing that but I couldn't be more pedantic than NY. That's impossible.Comment
-
Sometimes I can just about take it but generally I find it comes close to being the very definition of smug.Originally posted by captainfog View Post
It's one of my favourite programmes, very rarely miss a show
Portillo has mellowed in his old age and Abbot is always good value. They make a good double act. Andrew Neil makes me chuckle too.
I agree though that at their worst Portillo and Neil can be odious creatures."The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
-- William BlakeComment
-
Comment
-
It wasn't quite as heroic as Carlton Palmer's 'Holocaust' punditry, mind.
And I'm with Foggy on This Week.Comment
-
I find Andrew Neil obnoxious to say the least. He's one of those people who overestimates his importance.Originally posted by captainfog View Post Why do you hate it so much?
Mmmm I think its more self depreciating than smug. That's why I enjoy it so much, none of them take themselves very seriously on it. At least, that's my take on it..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Really? I'll make sure I watch that.Originally posted by Hollowman View Post.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Comment
-
Foggy's the black one.Comment
-
Comment