Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Fletcher and Hargreaves would have definitely done better than Anderson, who's a total ****house and a joke of a player, and Giggs.
My point is that its clutching at straws. Would they have made much of a difference? Hargreaves positionally is woeful, he goes all over the place, Fletcher would have been able to add energy but again, technically, could he have made an impact?
Simply put, Xavi, Busquets and Iniesta ruled that midfield with deft football.
My point is that its clutching at straws. Would they have made much of a difference? Hargreaves positionally is woeful, he goes all over the place, Fletcher would have been able to add energy but again, technically, could he have made an impact?
Simply put, Xavi, Busquets and Iniesta ruled that midfield with deft football.
My point is that its clutching at straws. Would they have made much of a difference? Hargreaves positionally is woeful, he goes all over the place, Fletcher would have been able to add energy but again, technically, could he have made an impact?
Simply put, Xavi, Busquets and Iniesta ruled that midfield with deft football.
Only ours and chelsea's midfield with essien would have stood a chance against that trio
We showed other teams that if you don't show them any respect and just go at them, then they can be beaten. It's a pity that other teams this season were defeated by them before kick-off. We're a much better side than that bunch of ****e, Chelsea are too. They get results simply because other teams and referees fear them, when that doesn't happen they're ****ed.
Comment