Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Zonal Marking

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    We conceded the least amount on goals and free-kicks last season, but played more games tan anybody else.
    Proof enough for me.
    Blank

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by Resu
      We conceded the least amount on goals and free-kicks last season, but played more games tan anybody else.
      Proof enough for me.


      We have only conceded one set peice goal this season I believe and that was with new defenders due to injuries and being caught cold from HT.
      www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

      www.twitter.com/lbmlt

      www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

      Comment


        #18
        Teams score from corners and free kicks all the time - most of them against the man to man marking system, but I don't ever see anyone bang on about the faults of that particular system.
        Oh I don't know.

        Comment


          #19
          People don't like change it's a fact, simple as that. Personally I prefer the zonal marking system, it's proven that it works when implemented properly.
          Thomas Hicks Senior

          Comment


            #20
            The only reason zonal marking at set-pieces is more difficult for many players to get used to is because it's not the standard. It is making the transition from man-to-man to zonal that is difficult, it's not that zonal is inherently tactically demanding.

            Both systems work when implemented correctly. They just have slightly different pros and cons.
            Like blood on iron

            Comment

            Working...
            X