Aye, me too. Not a big fan of old melty head, but can't fault what he's said here
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
F*** Off Harry Redknapp
Collapse
X
-
Why wouldn't he come out in support of a fellow manager when things like this happened to someone else? At least, Rafa documented issues which weren't necessarily associated with LFC. You're sure that Harry will be having a glass of wine with Mr. Ferguson when all of this will be over, the hypocritical c*nt.Originally posted by Craig_H View PostAnd Rafa wasnt in his 'facts' speech?Are we winning?
Comment
-
The problem is that the referees don't need to explain their decisions after the games so they can give a **** decision knowing they will get away with it and that the PL and FA will back them all the way.
Let the referees do post match interviews and the problem wouldn't exist. Stop defending the referees all the ****ing time.
When they make strange decisions then they simply must tell why they did it just like the manager explains strange subs and so on.Stop the cyberhate

from now on I will skip talking about our finances. That is a promise and will save myself from looking like a 
Susan Black
Comment
-
Same here.Originally posted by Shaggy View PostI'm with him on this one.
What is point of asking him about his views if he will be punished for speaking against the rubbish call.
If he said Nani is a cunt (he is but that's beyond the point) I could understand that but for him calling a joke call "a farce" and being potentially fined by The Football Association for doing so is an utter nonsense.Last edited by Mostar; 01-11-10, 09:19 PM.Member #1 of the Luis Suarez fan club
Comment
-
You'd create a new problem. Ref does a post match interview, admits he didnt see the incident, so couldnt give it. Next morning's headlines: "Who's the blind ******* in the black?"Originally posted by Arn View PostThe problem is that the referees don't need to explain their decisions after the games so they can give a **** decision knowing they will get away with it and that the PL and FA will back them all the way.
Let the referees do post match interviews and the problem wouldn't exist. Stop defending the referees all the ****ing time.
When they make strange decisions then they simply must tell why they did it just like the manager explains strange subs and so on.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Craig_H View PostYou'd create a new problem. Ref does a post match interview, admits he didnt see the incident, so couldnt give it. Next morning's headlines: "Who's the blind ******* in the black?"
The only pressure for referees to speak to the media comes from, surprise, surprise, the media.
It makes their job easier, it all adds to the circus. Football is eating itself, it's fat and bloated and the sooner it keels over and dies the better..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
But what would we all bitch about..?Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
The only pressure for referees to speak to the media comes from, surprise, surprise, the media.
It makes their job easier, it all adds to the circus. Football is eating itself, it's fat and bloated and the sooner it keels over and dies the better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Icon View PostBut what would we all bitch about..?
You know we'll easily find something.
Collars and leads are the manacles and chains of animal oppression, man.Originally posted by Craig_H View PostNeil Young's collar?
In the words of John Merrick, I am not an animal.
Hang on...OK, more accurately, I am an animal but I am not a pet. I wear no collar..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
Comment