Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
A lot of people run a race to see who is fastest. I run to see who has the most guts, who can punish himself into exhausting pace, and then at the end, punish himself even more.
I doubt they'd get rid of an otherwise excellent senior executive because of a lapse of judgement on one employee contract.
So clearly, by definition, he wasn't an otherwise excellent senior executive. If Carragher's contract had anything to do with the decision to dump him, then I'd suggest it's more likely to be because of how he operated (politicking and paying off a player and/or presenting the new owners with a fait accompli) or at the very least because it wasn't the only unwise decision he was responsible for (Bronto springs to mind).
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Lack of vision leads to bumping into things. Bumping into things leads to pain. Pain leads to suffering. Suffering leads to hate. Hate leads to the Dark Side.
Klopp on LFC vs MUFC (March 9th 2016) - "This is why I love football. This is why we watched it when we were young. I can still not have enough of it."
Always, keep your face to the sun, and shadows will fall behind you.
Originally Posted by Neil Young
Hope leads to disappointment. Disappointment leads to suffering. Suffering leads to hate. Hate leads to the Dark Side.
Originally Posted by Neil Young
Aguero joining Man Utd would lead to resentment. Resentment leads to suffering. Suffering leads to hate. Hate leads to the Dark Side.
Originally Posted by Neil Young
Lack of vision leads to bumping into things. Bumping into things leads to pain. Pain leads to suffering. Suffering leads to hate. Hate leads to the Dark Side.
I don't think the amount would have been the problem in the Carragher case. The problem would have been that there is no way we would have offered him a two year deal. It would have been one year and then look at the situation again after that year.
Would Carragher have signed that? Who knows? He made a lot of fuss about that we didn't offer him a new deal with only one year remaining. That points to that he wouldn't have signed it if we only had offered him a one year deal but that is all speculation.
It wasnt contract length they were unhappy with
It was the fact he got a pay rise that irked them
They would have offered him the same length of contract but reduced wages
Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."
I doubt they'd get rid of an otherwise excellent senior executive because of a lapse of judgement on one employee contract.
So clearly, by definition, he wasn't an otherwise excellent senior executive. If Carragher's contract had anything to do with the decision to dump him, then I'd suggest it's more likely to be because of how he operated (politicking and paying off a player and/or presenting the new owners with a fait accompli) or at the very least because it wasn't the only unwise decision he was responsible for (Bronto springs to mind).
I think the Carra contract was the straw that broke the camels back
Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."
Aguero's ****ing ****e. I could get 30 a season in Spain (which is only marginally less than the 40 a year I'd still bag in the SPL)
A lot of people run a race to see who is fastest. I run to see who has the most guts, who can punish himself into exhausting pace, and then at the end, punish himself even more.
That's not an answer, it's just repeating the question.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment