Tevez leaving City

[Craig_H]

Why on earth would City want Torres?

At least Tevez is actually a good player when he can be arsed to get on the pitch

[Le Chef]

Why on earth would City want Torres?

At least Tevez is actually a good player when he can be arsed to get on the pitch

its a face saver for both clubs

[Craig_H]

Not sure Tevez has a face worth saving.

[Arn]

I don't believe that Real Madrid is interested. The player Real will try and sign is Van Persie IMO.

The only club I can see him moving to in Spain is Malaga.

I think that he will end up at PSG.

[IN_RAFA_WE_TRUST]

Madrid will sign neymar. Not tevez.
Unless they want to sign both.

[rudedog]

I can't believe these posts. How can we reward the guy almost this entire thread has condemned as a cunt?! I don't want him anywhere near our club, sometimes being a great player isn't a good enough reason to bring someone in.

I would absolutely hate it if we signed him.

totally agree

[Darkon]

PSG is a good shout, forgotten how rich they have become and they are pretty much guarenteed CL next year unlike Malaga.

[Mostar]

Madrid will sign neymar. Not tevez.
Unless they want to sign both.

They are completely different types of players and it is very possible imo that both will be there in January.

Having someone of Tevez qualities could help Real close down the gap with Barca.

He hasn't really played this year and I think he'll be eager and hungry to prove that he is still a world class footballer, which can help
Real (if that is where he will end up) enormously.

[Chrono]

I think Kenny's man-management skills would work a treat on Tevez.

And yes, Tevez is a cunt but we're not inviting him round for dinner, we'd be putting him on a football pitch to win us games. Things are hard and competitive enough, without needing to restrict our recruitment policy to 'nice guys' who are good at football.

Ignoring the fact he refused to play football and generally causes havoc between the players and the manager. You don't think Man U and Man C realise he is a great player? He's not worth the baggage and could potentially **** up the harmony of the squad. It's not about "nice guys" it's about not employing total cunts that could have a massive detrimental affect on our club.

It matters very little as it's never going to happen in a million years.

[Vermilion]

Ignoring the fact he refused to play football and generally causes havoc between the players and the manager. You don't think Man U and Man C realise he is a great player? He's not worth the baggage and could potentially **** up the harmony of the squad. It's not about "nice guys" it's about not employing total cunts that could have a massive detrimental affect on our club.

It matters very little as it's never going to happen in a million years.

Would do AC's confidence the world of good to have a loan player come in and take his place in the team, because Tevez would want to be playing imo. (Although with the three of em playing in the same 11 ?)

But God help us if he ever played instead of Suarez.

No thank you, to much potential hassle.

[Craig_H]

Ignoring the fact he refused to play football and generally causes havoc between the players and the manager. You don't think Man U and Man C realise he is a great player? He's not worth the baggage and could potentially **** up the harmony of the squad. It's not about "nice guys" it's about not employing total cunts that could have a massive detrimental affect on our club.

It matters very little as it's never going to happen in a million years.

How detrimental was his impact on United's two title-winning seasons? Or City's charge into the CL?

He always seems fine for a year or two, and then the problems kick off. So getting him in for a year or even 6 month loan, before shipping him off, i would suggest, could work very much in our favour.

Of course Man Utd and City dont/didnt think he's worth the baggage - because they're already at the top without him. We're not. It's hard enough for us to get to the top and players of this level, even if only as a short term option, would increase our quality significantly.

[RichC]

How detrimental was his impact on United's two title-winning seasons? Or City's charge into the CL?

He always seems fine for a year or two, and then the problems kick off. So getting him in for a year or even 6 month loan, before shipping him off, i would suggest, could work very much in our favour.

Of course Man Utd and City dont/didnt think he's worth the baggage - because they're already at the top without him. We're not. It's hard enough for us to get to the top and players of this level, even if only as a short term option, would increase our quality significantly.

Highly unlikely he'll turn up with us but he'd certainly offer an awful lot of quality even if it was a short term 6 month deal.

He has the quality to be the difference for a top 4 position for us.

[Arn]

How detrimental was his impact on United's two title-winning seasons? Or City's charge into the CL?

He always seems fine for a year or two, and then the problems kick off. So getting him in for a year or even 6 month loan, before shipping him off, i would suggest, could work very much in our favour.

Of course Man Utd and City dont/didnt think he's worth the baggage - because they're already at the top without him. We're not. It's hard enough for us to get to the top and players of this level, even if only as a short term option, would increase our quality significantly.

They even blamed him for not learning the language It is up to the clubs to put up rules that a player must learn the language or he will be sold. If they don't have a rule like that then they can't blame the players if they don't give a **** learning it.

Carroll was as big problem off the pitch as Tevez but we ended up signing him. No one know how a player will react at a new club and with new team mates. He may not moan at all or be a problem at all if he signed for us. We don't know that.

[Tee]

I think he would have been a revelation at Anfield. BUT, under Rafa not Kenny. Just my take on it.

[Chrono]

How detrimental was his impact on United's two title-winning seasons? Or City's charge into the CL?

He always seems fine for a year or two, and then the problems kick off. So getting him in for a year or even 6 month loan, before shipping him off, i would suggest, could work very much in our favour.

Of course Man Utd and City dont/didnt think he's worth the baggage - because they're already at the top without him. We're not. It's hard enough for us to get to the top and players of this level, even if only as a short term option, would increase our quality significantly.

We will have to agree to disagree