Aquilani

[RedReet]

I watch that and think meh. It was against a poor team, he is slow with his first touch, and while there were a few nice long passes there were plenty that were inaccurate. And that was possibly his best game. Not enough for me.

What does that mean?

[Craig_H]

And how would you categorize Lennon then?

Personally I'd take Aqua man over Lennon any day of the week.

Lennon would beat men, make things happen and create mayhem with his pace and directness.

Aquilani will do very little and get injured.

[Craig_H]

He was our best player when he got the chance to play more often. He created a lot of chances and had a few assists.

Average as best my ass. If Gerrard had delivered in the same way then you would have said how excellent he is.

No he wasnt, that's your opinion.

And to compare Aquilani to Gerrard is one of the most laughable things you've posted...and there's a lot of competition for that prize too.

[Fernandinho]

Lennon would beat men, make things happen and create mayhem with his pace and directness.

Aquilani will do very little and get injured.

I dont agree at all. Lennon is decent on his day. But since that injury last season when he was on red hot form he hasn't been anything special. We already have Aquilani and his market price seems to be around 10 mil at the moment. Lennon would cost us double that and I can only see them being of about the same value to our squad.

[Mattshark]

Lennon would beat men, make things happen and create mayhem with his pace and directness.

Aquilani will do very little and get injured.

He would look confused at deep lying defences and show a complete lack of intelligence and constantly hit crosses to no one.
We don't need another brain dead pace merchant.

[Craig_H]

Each to their own, i dont rate Aquilani at all and Lennon would give us something we dont have & something we need. Aquilani will barely manage to play 20 games.

[danperkins]

Both Lennon and Aquilani are just meh, but if i had the choice it would be Lennon every time. We do not need Aquilani, the position he would play is covered and it's not an area that is priority, whereas the wings are IMO.

Although IMO Lennon is a scatty headless chicken, he is a winger and does have severe pace and can be a handful.

Personally i hope Aqua is sold IMO he is not suited to the premier league, and we don't go near Lennon

[Craig_H]

I dont agree at all. Lennon is decent on his day. But since that injury last season when he was on red hot form he hasn't been anything special. We already have Aquilani and his market price seems to be around 10 mil at the moment. Lennon would cost us double that and I can only see them being of about the same value to our squad.

Contradiction there surely? On his day he's only 'decent', but he's also been 'red hot' and 'special' ?

[Kenneth]

He was our best player when he got the chance to play more often. He created a lot of chances and had a few assists.

Average as best my ass. If Gerrard had delivered in the same way then you would have said how excellent he is.

Revisionist nonsense. You don't have to rate Lennon, but pretending Aquilani was amazing is laughable.

[red g]

Each to their own, i dont rate Aquilani at all and Lennon would give us something we dont have & something we need. Aquilani will barely manage to play 20 games.

Would Lenon manage much more?

[Craig_H]

Would Lenon manage much more?

219 games for Spurs in 6 seasons suggests so.

[Kenneth]

He would look confused at deep lying defences and show a complete lack of intelligence and constantly hit crosses to no one.
We don't need another brain dead pace merchant.

If he constantly hit crosses, Carroll would have a field day.

[Arn]

Each to their own, i dont rate Aquilani at all and Lennon would give us something we dont have & something we need. Aquilani will barely manage to play 20 games.

How often have Lennon delivered at Spurs? Say one game out of ten. The rest of the games he is very average.

What would Lennon offer us? Well, he could be our new headless chicken because that is the way he play. Some times he get lucky and play an excellent game but as I said in most games he is very very average.

His game intelligence more or less don't exist.

Is he a team player? No if you believe the rumours. The opposite if you again believe the rumours.

Lennon better than Aquilani

[Craig_H]

How often have Lennon delivered at Spurs? Say one game out of ten. The rest of the games he is very average.

What would Lennon offer us? Well, he could be our new headless chicken because that is the way he play. Some times he get lucky and play an excellent but as I said in most games he is very very average.

His game intelligence more or less don't exist.

Is he a team player? No if you believe the rumours. The opposite if you again believe the rumours.

Lennon better than Aquilani

This is exactly why people rip you to pieces. It's bordering on embarrassing.

I never said Lennon was 'better' than Aquilani, so you know what you can do with your 'haha' smiley. He's a better fit for what we actually need/lack in our squad though, far more so than Aquilani who would and should struggle to get a game.

As for one good game in ten for Lennon, i suppose you must watch Spurs games in their tens then? Even when they play at the same time as us?

[Arn]

This is exactly why people rip you to pieces. It's bordering on embarrassing.

I never said Lennon was 'better' than Aquilani, so you know what you can do with your 'haha' smiley.

As for one good game in ten for Lennon, i suppose you must watch Spurs games in their tens then? Even when they play at the same time as us?

Utter Arnonsense, as usual.

You are a funny man Craig