Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How thick would you have to be....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    Originally posted by Vermilion View Post
    hmmm, i'm not so sure...if you look at the wrinkle under his arm it cleary.....oh! never mind!
    Most of the photo has not been retouched but there's some pretty obvious artifacting on the woman's tattoos, there's no way they're genuine.

    That's not my opinion, it's Art Vandalay's opinion.

    Yes, I repeat, Art Vandalay - THAT Art Vandalay.

    Case closed.
    .
    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



    May the Lord bless this post.

    Comment


      #47
      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
      Most of the photo has not been retouched but there's some pretty obvious artifacting on the woman's tattoos, there's no way they're genuine.

      That's not my opinion, it's Art Vandalay's opinion.

      Yes, I repeat, Art Vandalay - THAT Art Vandalay.

      Case closed.
      Funny that he's got a name befitting of the status that Photoshop wizards normally boast.
      Are we winning?

      Comment


        #48
        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
        Most of the photo has not been retouched but there's some pretty obvious artifacting on the woman's tattoos, there's no way they're genuine.

        That's not my opinion, it's Art Vandalay's opinion.

        Yes, I repeat, Art Vandalay - THAT Art Vandalay.

        Case closed.
        h:

        Comment


          #49
          I would like to dissociate myself from the previous two posts in this thread attributed to me.

          They are fakes and I can categorically deny posting them. I have been fitted up.

          Thank you.
          .
          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



          May the Lord bless this post.

          Comment

          Working...
          X