Manchester City

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fredo
    Not to be taken seriously
    • Aug 2010
    • 35173

    #2476
    It's not. Chelsea are running away with it leaving the rest to fight places behind. If Spurs win this one it'll still be on, so I hope they win to keep this alive.
    Are we winning?

    Comment

    • RichC
      Meh
      • Jul 2006
      • 37415

      #2477
      Spurs got away with that today. Some (more) terrible refereeing decisions. Best result for us I guess

      Comment

      • red g
        • Jul 2006
        • 29964

        #2478
        Originally posted by Fredo
        It's not. Chelsea are running away with it leaving the rest to fight places behind. If Spurs win this one it'll still be on, so I hope they win to keep this alive.
        really? you want Spurs to win to make it more a fight with Chelsea.....than a draw which keeps us within a win of 2nd.

        Still reckon City will finish above Spurs and it will be Spurs missing out on top 4. Just think a couple of injuries to Spurs and they will capitulate.
        _____________________________________

        Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

        Think we have the answer..Slot!!

        Comment

        • BigChief
          Paisley
          • Sep 2007
          • 13826

          #2479
          Originally posted by red g
          really? you want Spurs to win to make it more a fight with Chelsea.....than a draw which keeps us within a win of 2nd.

          Still reckon City will finish above Spurs and it will be Spurs missing out on top 4. Just think a couple of injuries to Spurs and they will capitulate.
          Yep their bottle jobbie will come around April. We lose yet have no serious damage ahead or behind us. Time for Burnley to turn up like they did against us.
          One tit for another.

          Comment

          • red g
            • Jul 2006
            • 29964

            #2480
            shows how well we did at the start....I cant see us winning the title, but get january out of the way and we will at worse be a few points behind the chasing pack and we will get back to our winning runs while CHelsea/Arsenal/Spurs wll have theres at some point.
            _____________________________________

            Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

            Think we have the answer..Slot!!

            Comment

            • Fredo
              Not to be taken seriously
              • Aug 2010
              • 35173

              #2481
              Originally posted by red g
              really? you want Spurs to win to make it more a fight with Chelsea.....than a draw which keeps us within a win of 2nd.

              Still reckon City will finish above Spurs and it will be Spurs missing out on top 4. Just think a couple of injuries to Spurs and they will capitulate.
              Spurs winning gives Chelsea less breathing space while still being within touching distance of ourselves. If Chelsea win tomorrow then the league is almost sewn up for them, especially that they don't have a taxing schedule for the remainder of the season.
              Are we winning?

              Comment

              • Fredo
                Not to be taken seriously
                • Aug 2010
                • 35173

                #2482


                WTF is that about from the journalist?

                Asking about how a manager feels about the level of a young player? I feel for Pep and any other foreign manager over here. It's all ****ing biased; British managers don't get all the crap that foreign managers get. Sam ****ing Allardyce is considered a saint and ****ing Alan Pardew is a demi-god with plenty of witty south London repartie.

                **** off.

                Bantz is whatz is all aboutz.
                Are we winning?

                Comment

                • Roboklopp
                  Cuboid Humanoid
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 30548

                  #2483
                  Don't really see your point in this case TBH, although your general argument has some merit.
                  3rd place. Worst champions ever.

                  Comment

                  • Fivex
                    The Wisp
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 23867

                    #2484
                    Don't encourage him!
                    Hello mert.

                    Comment

                    • Bender
                      Hodgsoned
                      • Jul 2006
                      • 37671

                      #2485
                      Manchester City will not sell Aguero for anything less than £80m. (The Times - subscription required)

                      Comment

                      • gratziani
                        Dalglish
                        • Dec 2006
                        • 2377

                        #2486
                        Keep hearing how brilliant it is for City and their youthful attacking trio and giving them a chance to play

                        Sterling 50 million, Jesus 30 million , Sane 30 Million , not sure on the exact prices but ****ing hell what a brilliant youth policy that is.

                        Comment

                        • Irishnev
                          Paisley
                          • Aug 2006
                          • 18295

                          #2487
                          Originally posted by gratziani
                          Keep hearing how brilliant it is for City and their youthful attacking trio and giving them a chance to play

                          Sterling 50 million, Jesus 30 million , Sane 30 Million , not sure on the exact prices but ****ing hell what a brilliant youth policy that is.
                          That's the thing though - you need to get them before City do i.e. a year before they make the big break though. City want to buy young players but they want the absolute best ones:

                          Sterling - £50m (inc English premium)
                          Jesus - £29m
                          Sane - £36m
                          Stones - £50m

                          They missed out on Laporte but bought Stones ().

                          Once the player is already at a big club Schalke, Dortmund, Leverkusen, Atletico, Premier League club it makes it harder for us.

                          We need to buy Van Dijk from Celtic or Weigl from 1860 Munich for example to get proper value otherwise we are out of that market.

                          The club seems to have pinned their hopes on Brandt but Sane is the yardstick that Leverkusen will put on him now - he'll cost £30m+ I'm sure.

                          Comment

                          • Vermilion
                            Shooterista
                            • Dec 2007
                            • 32026

                            #2488
                            Should have bought Van Dijk before Celtic tbf.

                            Comment

                            • baitman
                              Dad's Cabs
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 27745

                              #2489
                              Originally posted by Vermilion
                              Should have bought Van Dijk before Celtic tbf.
                              removing all the weak links makes us stronger

                              too many gutless players, no beef or desire. pussies everywhere... sack them all.

                              Comment

                              • Vermilion
                                Shooterista
                                • Dec 2007
                                • 32026

                                #2490
                                Desperate for Dijk we are.

                                Comment

                                Working...