It's stuff like this that makes the charges and financial d oping so frustrating this is a legitimate deal brought about by success attained by financial doping. If found guilty they will only be punished for the first few years but it allowed them to build their empire which won't be affected
-
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved. -
We are here for a good time not a long time....Comment
-
Precisely right.Originally posted by Exiled_red View Post
And where is that assessment and punishment? Nowhere to be seen. Hopefully the new regulator will put an end to this, but my expectation is that their focus will be on club sustainability in the lower leagues rather than the actual fairness of the higher league competition. I know they will be charged with fit and proper assessments, but not - I guess - of current ownerships.Really?Comment
-
As per an update from The Times, Premier League officials are worried as the City Financial Fair Play (FFP) case has cost both sides £200million (€229m / $267.5m) combined.
If its going to go down to who has the deepest pockets only one winner there._____________________________________
Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?
Think we have the answer..Slot!!
Comment
-
I think this is probably what City want, essentially to make it drag on and cost so much that the PL give up and they 'win' by defaultOriginally posted by red g View PostThe only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.Comment
-
Its amazing they cant just kick them out.Comment
-
Surely this will be a spend they need to account for in their books though?Originally posted by Exiled_red View PostComment
-
Originally posted by rudedog View Post
Afaik legal costs for a footy club count as an operational expense so they should be listed as part of a club's outgoings/costs and as such should impact their accounts.I don't hate people. I just feel better when they aren't around.
Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindednessComment
-
Not sure how it works as a FFP or PSR expense, I imagine that they would fall outside the rules (i.e. owners could inject money to cover these if they wanted to) because some non-football lawsuit probably shouldn't impact on the football side of things is how I imagine it is viewed and I doubt they thought to distinguish football legal expenses and non-football legal expenses in rules.Originally posted by rudedog View Post
If it doesn't hamper them in terms of FFP or PSR imagine City owners are happy to chuck money at lawyer for this.The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.Comment
-
It should definitely affect their accounts, if it doesn’t then it’s another massive own goal by the PLComment
-
SLAPP tactics essentially, which I understand are not legal in the UKOriginally posted by Exiled_red View PostFootball without Origi is nothingComment
-
Rodri injured again.
[ame]https://twitter.com/fabrizioromano/status/1953924696585433094[/ame]Modifying post.Comment
-
CrocKlopp on LFC vs MUFC (March 9th 2016) - "This is why I love football. This is why we watched it when we were young. I can still not have enough of it."
Always, keep your face to the sun, and shadows will fall behind you.Comment
-
Rushed him back for the CWC didn't they?
Picked up a needless injury during his only appearance. Absolute madness.
Realistically it takes 2 full seasons to get back to 100% after his type of injury.
(Look at me knowing better than the combined might of Citehs medical team
)
Comment
-
Well, the CWC already not looking too clever and that's before the games start coming quickly.Comment
Comment